Dual screening during televised election debates is a new domain in which political elites and journalists seek to influence audience attitudes and behavior. But to what extent do non-elite dual screeners seek to influence others, particularly their social media followers, social media users in general, and even politicians and journalists? And how does this behavior affect short- and longer-term engagement with election campaigns? Using unique, event-based, panel survey data from the main 2015 UK general election debate (Wave 1 = 2,351; Wave 2 = 1,168) we reveal the conditions under which people experience agency, empowerment, and engagement now that social media have reconfigured broadcast political television.
Chadwick, A., O'Loughlin, B., Vaccari, C. (2017). Why People Dual Screen Political Debates and Why It Matters for Democratic Engagement. JOURNAL OF BROADCASTING & ELECTRONIC MEDIA, 61(2), 220-239 [10.1080/08838151.2017.1309415].
Why People Dual Screen Political Debates and Why It Matters for Democratic Engagement
Vaccari, Cristian
2017
Abstract
Dual screening during televised election debates is a new domain in which political elites and journalists seek to influence audience attitudes and behavior. But to what extent do non-elite dual screeners seek to influence others, particularly their social media followers, social media users in general, and even politicians and journalists? And how does this behavior affect short- and longer-term engagement with election campaigns? Using unique, event-based, panel survey data from the main 2015 UK general election debate (Wave 1 = 2,351; Wave 2 = 1,168) we reveal the conditions under which people experience agency, empowerment, and engagement now that social media have reconfigured broadcast political television.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.