Purpose: To evaluate the clinical features of breast cancer patients with genetic susceptibility to this disease and to investigate the contribution of BRCA1 germline mutations to the phenotype of these tumors. Patients and methods: We reviewed the clinical and pathological records of 102 women with suspected inherited susceptibility to breast cancer consecutively seen at the Genetic Oncology Service of Parma, Italy. Sixty-two patients with a high probability of harboring a germline, cancer-predisposing mutation were tested for BRCA1 mutations. Exon 11 was screened using the protein truncation test and detected mutations were confirmed by direct sequencing (DS). All other exons were analyzed by DS. Results: Among the 62 patients with a completed mutation analysis, 48 (77.4%) had wild-type BRCA1, six (9.6%) had variants of unclear significance, eight (13%) had deleterious mutations. BRCA1-associated breast cancers (BABC) were significantly less likely to be diagnosed at stage I than breast cancers in women without mutations (12.5% vs 51%; P = 0.045), more likely to have a high proliferation rate (100% vs 24%, P < 0.001), and more likely to be histological grade 3 (100% vs 14%, P < 0.001), estrogen and progesterone receptor negative (87.5% vs 13%, P < 0.001; 75% vs 23%, P = 0.004), and p53 positive (87.5% vs 30%, P = 0.023). All tumors with BRCA1 mutations were HER-2/neu negative compared with 57% of the non-BRCA1 tumors (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between BABC and non-BABC in 20-year relapse-free survival, 20-year event-free survival, and 20-year overall survival. Conclusion: In this population-based study, BABC seems to present with adverse molecular features when compared with non-BABC, although the prognosis appears to be similar.

Musolino A, Michiara M, Bella MA, Naldi N, Zanelli P, Bortesi B, et al. (2005). Molecular profile and clinical variables in BRCA1-positive breast cancers. A population-based study. TUMORI, 91(6), 505-512.

Molecular profile and clinical variables in BRCA1-positive breast cancers. A population-based study

Musolino A;ARDIZZONI, ANDREA;
2005

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical features of breast cancer patients with genetic susceptibility to this disease and to investigate the contribution of BRCA1 germline mutations to the phenotype of these tumors. Patients and methods: We reviewed the clinical and pathological records of 102 women with suspected inherited susceptibility to breast cancer consecutively seen at the Genetic Oncology Service of Parma, Italy. Sixty-two patients with a high probability of harboring a germline, cancer-predisposing mutation were tested for BRCA1 mutations. Exon 11 was screened using the protein truncation test and detected mutations were confirmed by direct sequencing (DS). All other exons were analyzed by DS. Results: Among the 62 patients with a completed mutation analysis, 48 (77.4%) had wild-type BRCA1, six (9.6%) had variants of unclear significance, eight (13%) had deleterious mutations. BRCA1-associated breast cancers (BABC) were significantly less likely to be diagnosed at stage I than breast cancers in women without mutations (12.5% vs 51%; P = 0.045), more likely to have a high proliferation rate (100% vs 24%, P < 0.001), and more likely to be histological grade 3 (100% vs 14%, P < 0.001), estrogen and progesterone receptor negative (87.5% vs 13%, P < 0.001; 75% vs 23%, P = 0.004), and p53 positive (87.5% vs 30%, P = 0.023). All tumors with BRCA1 mutations were HER-2/neu negative compared with 57% of the non-BRCA1 tumors (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between BABC and non-BABC in 20-year relapse-free survival, 20-year event-free survival, and 20-year overall survival. Conclusion: In this population-based study, BABC seems to present with adverse molecular features when compared with non-BABC, although the prognosis appears to be similar.
2005
Musolino A, Michiara M, Bella MA, Naldi N, Zanelli P, Bortesi B, et al. (2005). Molecular profile and clinical variables in BRCA1-positive breast cancers. A population-based study. TUMORI, 91(6), 505-512.
Musolino A; Michiara M; Bella MA; Naldi N; Zanelli P; Bortesi B; Capelletti M; Soldani L; Camisa R; Martella E; Franciosi V; Savi M; Neri TM; Ardizzon...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/595074
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact