Purpose: The introduction of transcatheter aortic valves has focused attention on the results of conventional aortic valve surgery in high-risk patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate 5-years outcomes in this category of patients in the current surgical era. Methods: This is an observational retrospective study of 581 high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement from 2008 to 2013,with a mean logistic EuroSCORE of 26.6% ± 14.6%. Data were prospectively collected in a database of Emilia-Romagna region (Italy). Results: Overall 30-day mortality was 9.3%. Stroke rate was 1.5%. At 1-,3-,and 5-years overall mortality was 18.2%,30.4%,and 42.2%,cardiac death rate was 3.9%,9.2%,and 12.9%,stroke rate 2.5%,7.7%,and 10.2%,re-operation occurrence 0.2%,0.9% and 1.3%,and new pacemaker implantation was 2.3%,5.1% and 7.8%. At multivariate analysis,urgency,hemodynamic instability,LVEF ≤30%,NYHA III-IV,severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD),extra-cardiac arteriopathy,cerebrovascular disease,and creatinine >2.0 mg/dL remained independent predictors of 5-year mortality. Conclusion: The results of the current study add weight to the evidence that traditional aortic valve replacement can be performed in high-risk patients with satisfactory 5-year mortality and morbidity. Our study may help to improve decision-making in this category of high-risk patients with aortic valve disease. © 2016 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. All rights reserved.
Nicolini, F., Fortuna, D., Contini, G.a., Pacini, D., Gabbieri, D., De Palma, R., et al. (2016). Long-term outcomes of conventional aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients: Where do we stand?. ANNALS OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 22(5), 304-311 [10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00165].
Long-term outcomes of conventional aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients: Where do we stand?
PACINI, DAVIDE;
2016
Abstract
Purpose: The introduction of transcatheter aortic valves has focused attention on the results of conventional aortic valve surgery in high-risk patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate 5-years outcomes in this category of patients in the current surgical era. Methods: This is an observational retrospective study of 581 high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement from 2008 to 2013,with a mean logistic EuroSCORE of 26.6% ± 14.6%. Data were prospectively collected in a database of Emilia-Romagna region (Italy). Results: Overall 30-day mortality was 9.3%. Stroke rate was 1.5%. At 1-,3-,and 5-years overall mortality was 18.2%,30.4%,and 42.2%,cardiac death rate was 3.9%,9.2%,and 12.9%,stroke rate 2.5%,7.7%,and 10.2%,re-operation occurrence 0.2%,0.9% and 1.3%,and new pacemaker implantation was 2.3%,5.1% and 7.8%. At multivariate analysis,urgency,hemodynamic instability,LVEF ≤30%,NYHA III-IV,severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD),extra-cardiac arteriopathy,cerebrovascular disease,and creatinine >2.0 mg/dL remained independent predictors of 5-year mortality. Conclusion: The results of the current study add weight to the evidence that traditional aortic valve replacement can be performed in high-risk patients with satisfactory 5-year mortality and morbidity. Our study may help to improve decision-making in this category of high-risk patients with aortic valve disease. © 2016 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. All rights reserved.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


