Open fractures are severe, complex, limb-threatening and high-energy injuries, often involving lesions of both bone and soft tissues. Traditionally, treatment has been piecemeal by orthopaedic and plastic surgeons. This study aimed to prospectively investigate whether combining orthopaedic and plastic surgery in treating these injuries is more effective than the conventional orthopaedic care.A prospective multi-centre cohort study was conducted. Differences in the type of approach to severe limb trauma allowed a comparison between combined orthoplastic and traditional exclusively orthopaedic treatment. Time for fracture and soft tissue healing and the recovery of limb function were the main outcome measures studied. All patients suffering from a severe open tibial fracture were prospectively included between January 2012 and December 2013 and followed until December 2014. Recruiting units were as follows: (1) an established orthoplastic centre, (2) a unit without experience in the orthoplastic approach and (3) a unit where the orthoplastic approach has been recently introduced in a developing country (Pakistan).A total of 160 patients were included in the study. Of these, 70% were treated with an orthoplastic approach, whereas 30% were treated by an orthopaedic team. All outcome measures were statistically improved by the orthoplastic approach.A coordinated, combined pathway to both the bony and the soft tissue components of open tibial fractures through orthoplastic surgery can be successfully delivered with attention to important timelines to achieve better patient outcomes in different socio-economic settings.

Orthoplastic surgical collaboration is required to optimise the treatment of severe limb injuries: A multi-centre, prospective cohort study

BALDINI, TOMMASO;BALDINI, NICOLA;
2017

Abstract

Open fractures are severe, complex, limb-threatening and high-energy injuries, often involving lesions of both bone and soft tissues. Traditionally, treatment has been piecemeal by orthopaedic and plastic surgeons. This study aimed to prospectively investigate whether combining orthopaedic and plastic surgery in treating these injuries is more effective than the conventional orthopaedic care.A prospective multi-centre cohort study was conducted. Differences in the type of approach to severe limb trauma allowed a comparison between combined orthoplastic and traditional exclusively orthopaedic treatment. Time for fracture and soft tissue healing and the recovery of limb function were the main outcome measures studied. All patients suffering from a severe open tibial fracture were prospectively included between January 2012 and December 2013 and followed until December 2014. Recruiting units were as follows: (1) an established orthoplastic centre, (2) a unit without experience in the orthoplastic approach and (3) a unit where the orthoplastic approach has been recently introduced in a developing country (Pakistan).A total of 160 patients were included in the study. Of these, 70% were treated with an orthoplastic approach, whereas 30% were treated by an orthopaedic team. All outcome measures were statistically improved by the orthoplastic approach.A coordinated, combined pathway to both the bony and the soft tissue components of open tibial fractures through orthoplastic surgery can be successfully delivered with attention to important timelines to achieve better patient outcomes in different socio-economic settings.
Boriani, Filippo; Ul Haq, Ata; Baldini, Tommaso; Urso, Roberto; Granchi, Donatella; Baldini, Nicola; Tigani, Domenico; Tarar, Moazzam; Khan, Umraz
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11585/589807
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 18
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 36
social impact