As the taste receptor for monosodium glutamate (umami) is expressed in both murine and human spermatozoa and the presence of α-gustducin and α-transducin, G proteins involved in the umami taste signaling, has been described in boar germ cells, the aim of this study was to evaluate if monosodium glutamate (MSG) would exert any effect on sperm-oocyte binding, in vitro fertilization (IVF) and sperm parameters during in vitro induced capacitation. For sperm-zona pellucida binding assay, boar spermatozoa were preincubated for 1 h and then coincubated for 1 h with denuded in vitro matured oocytes in presence of different concentrations of MSG (0, 0.1, 1, 10 mM). MSG 1 and 10 mM significantly (P < 0.05) increased the mean number of sperm bound to ZP compared with control (12.3 ± 9.0, 17.8 ± 11.3, 17.6 ± 10.8, MSG 0, 1 and 10 mM respectively). For in vitro fertilization trials, both sperm preicubation (1 h) and gamete coincubation (1 h) were performed in presence of different concentrations of MSG (0, 0.1, 1, 10 mM). After 19 h of culture in fresh IVF medium, oocytes were fixed. MSG 1 mM significantly (P < 0.05) increased the penetration rate compared with control (53.7 ± 20.4 vs. 36.8 ± 16.2). The addition of MSG during in vitro induced capacitation of boar spermatozoa did not cause any significant difference, compared with control, on the percentage of viable cells, spermatozoa with intact acrosome and the percentage of spermatozoa displaying tyrosine-phosphorylation of sperm tail proteins. In order to evaluate whether the effect elicited by MSG could be due to glutamate uptake in boar spermatozoa, fertilization trials were performed in presence of either 1 mM MSG or 1 mM MSG + 100 μM DL-threo-beta-hydroxyaspartic acid (THA), a non selective inhibitor of glutamate uptake. A significant increase (P < 0.05) in the penetration rate in both MSG and MSG + THA groups compared to control was recorded (39.8 ± 15.7, 53.7 ± 22.1, 52.2 ± 23.7, Control, MSG and MSG + THA respectively) while no difference in penetration rate between MSG and MSG + THA treatment was observed suggesting that sperm glutamate transporters are not involved in the pathway mediating this effect. Our study demonstrates for the first time that glutamate exerts a positive effect on sperm-oocyte binding and fertilization. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanism by which glutamate exert his effect.

Spinaci, M., Bucci, D., Gadani, B., Porcu, E., Tamanini, C., Galeati, G. (2017). Pig sperm preincubation and gamete coincubation with glutamate enhance sperm-oocyte binding and in vitro fertilization. THERIOGENOLOGY, 95, 149-153 [10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.03.017].

Pig sperm preincubation and gamete coincubation with glutamate enhance sperm-oocyte binding and in vitro fertilization

SPINACI, MARCELLA;BUCCI, DIEGO;GADANI, BEATRICE;PORCU, ELEONORA;TAMANINI, CARLO;GALEATI, GIOVANNA
2017

Abstract

As the taste receptor for monosodium glutamate (umami) is expressed in both murine and human spermatozoa and the presence of α-gustducin and α-transducin, G proteins involved in the umami taste signaling, has been described in boar germ cells, the aim of this study was to evaluate if monosodium glutamate (MSG) would exert any effect on sperm-oocyte binding, in vitro fertilization (IVF) and sperm parameters during in vitro induced capacitation. For sperm-zona pellucida binding assay, boar spermatozoa were preincubated for 1 h and then coincubated for 1 h with denuded in vitro matured oocytes in presence of different concentrations of MSG (0, 0.1, 1, 10 mM). MSG 1 and 10 mM significantly (P < 0.05) increased the mean number of sperm bound to ZP compared with control (12.3 ± 9.0, 17.8 ± 11.3, 17.6 ± 10.8, MSG 0, 1 and 10 mM respectively). For in vitro fertilization trials, both sperm preicubation (1 h) and gamete coincubation (1 h) were performed in presence of different concentrations of MSG (0, 0.1, 1, 10 mM). After 19 h of culture in fresh IVF medium, oocytes were fixed. MSG 1 mM significantly (P < 0.05) increased the penetration rate compared with control (53.7 ± 20.4 vs. 36.8 ± 16.2). The addition of MSG during in vitro induced capacitation of boar spermatozoa did not cause any significant difference, compared with control, on the percentage of viable cells, spermatozoa with intact acrosome and the percentage of spermatozoa displaying tyrosine-phosphorylation of sperm tail proteins. In order to evaluate whether the effect elicited by MSG could be due to glutamate uptake in boar spermatozoa, fertilization trials were performed in presence of either 1 mM MSG or 1 mM MSG + 100 μM DL-threo-beta-hydroxyaspartic acid (THA), a non selective inhibitor of glutamate uptake. A significant increase (P < 0.05) in the penetration rate in both MSG and MSG + THA groups compared to control was recorded (39.8 ± 15.7, 53.7 ± 22.1, 52.2 ± 23.7, Control, MSG and MSG + THA respectively) while no difference in penetration rate between MSG and MSG + THA treatment was observed suggesting that sperm glutamate transporters are not involved in the pathway mediating this effect. Our study demonstrates for the first time that glutamate exerts a positive effect on sperm-oocyte binding and fertilization. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanism by which glutamate exert his effect.
2017
Spinaci, M., Bucci, D., Gadani, B., Porcu, E., Tamanini, C., Galeati, G. (2017). Pig sperm preincubation and gamete coincubation with glutamate enhance sperm-oocyte binding and in vitro fertilization. THERIOGENOLOGY, 95, 149-153 [10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.03.017].
Spinaci, M; Bucci, D.; Gadani, B.; Porcu, E.; Tamanini, C.; Galeati, G.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Spinaci_glutamate.pdf

Open Access dal 21/03/2018

Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione 205 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
205 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/586682
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact