Belowground carbon inputs, in particular rhizodeposition, are a key component of the global carbon cycle and yet their accurate quantification remains a major challenge. In the present paper, the in-growth soil cores-13Cmethod was used to quantify net root carbon input (root-derived C). Four different ecosystem types (forest, alpine grassland, apple orchard and vineyard) in northern Italy, characterized by C3 vegetation with a broad range of aboveground net primary production (ANPP; 155–770 gC m−2 y−1) were investigated. Cores, filled with soil of a known C4 isotopic signature were inserted at each site for twelve months. After extraction, root-derived C was quantified by applying a mass balance equation. Gross primary production (GPP) was determined by eddy covariance whereas ANPP was quantified using a biometric approach. NPP partitioning among sites differed, with fruit production dominating at agricultural sites. At these sites, belowground C inputs were dominated by rhizodeposits, likely due to relatively high root turnover. In natural ecosystems (forest and grassland) fine root production dominated belowground net primary production (BNPP) likely due to higher root growth determined by low phosphorus availability. Root derived C represented a significant contribution to BNPP varying from40 to 60%. Our results underline the fact that failure to account for rhizodeposits may lead to a significant underestimation of BNPP

Martinez, C., Alberti, G., Cotrufo, M., Magnani, F., Zanotelli, D., Camin, F., et al. (2016). Belowground carbon allocation patterns as determined by the in-growth soil core 13C technique across different ecosystem types. GEODERMA, 263, 140-150 [10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.043].

Belowground carbon allocation patterns as determined by the in-growth soil core 13C technique across different ecosystem types

MAGNANI, FEDERICO;
2016

Abstract

Belowground carbon inputs, in particular rhizodeposition, are a key component of the global carbon cycle and yet their accurate quantification remains a major challenge. In the present paper, the in-growth soil cores-13Cmethod was used to quantify net root carbon input (root-derived C). Four different ecosystem types (forest, alpine grassland, apple orchard and vineyard) in northern Italy, characterized by C3 vegetation with a broad range of aboveground net primary production (ANPP; 155–770 gC m−2 y−1) were investigated. Cores, filled with soil of a known C4 isotopic signature were inserted at each site for twelve months. After extraction, root-derived C was quantified by applying a mass balance equation. Gross primary production (GPP) was determined by eddy covariance whereas ANPP was quantified using a biometric approach. NPP partitioning among sites differed, with fruit production dominating at agricultural sites. At these sites, belowground C inputs were dominated by rhizodeposits, likely due to relatively high root turnover. In natural ecosystems (forest and grassland) fine root production dominated belowground net primary production (BNPP) likely due to higher root growth determined by low phosphorus availability. Root derived C represented a significant contribution to BNPP varying from40 to 60%. Our results underline the fact that failure to account for rhizodeposits may lead to a significant underestimation of BNPP
2016
Martinez, C., Alberti, G., Cotrufo, M., Magnani, F., Zanotelli, D., Camin, F., et al. (2016). Belowground carbon allocation patterns as determined by the in-growth soil core 13C technique across different ecosystem types. GEODERMA, 263, 140-150 [10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.043].
Martinez, C.; Alberti, G.; Cotrufo, M.F.; Magnani, F.; Zanotelli, D.; Camin, F.; Gianelle, D.; Cescatti, A.; Rodeghiero, M.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/585563
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 27
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact