Bio- and hydrometallurgical experimental setups at 2-l reactor scale for the processing of fly ash from municipal waste incinerators were explored. We aimed to compare chemical H2SO4 leaching and bioleaching; the latter involved the use of H2SO4 and a mixed culture of acidophilic bacteria. The leaching yields of several elements, including some of those considered as critical (Mg, Co, Ce, Cr, Ga, Nb, Nd, Sb and Sm), are provided. At the end of the experiments, both leaching methods resulted in comparable yields for Mg and Zn (>90%), Al and Mn (>85%), Cr (∼65%), Ga (∼60%), and Ce (∼50%). Chemical leaching showed the best yields for Cu (95%), Fe (91%), and Ni (93%), whereas bioleaching was effective for Nd (76%), Pb (59%), and Co (55%). The two leaching methods generated solids of different quality with respect to the original material as we removed and significantly reduced the metals amounts, and enriched solutions where metals can be recovered for example as mixed salts for further treatment. Compared to chemical leaching the bioleaching halved the use of H2SO4, i.e., a part of agent costs, as a likely consequence of bio-produced acid and improved metal solubility.

Metal removal from Municipal Solid Waste Incineration fly ash: A comparison between chemical leaching and bioleaching / Funari, V.; Mäkinen, J.; Salminen, J.; Braga, R; Dinelli, E.; Revitzer, H.. - In: WASTE MANAGEMENT. - ISSN 0956-053X. - STAMPA. - 60:(2017), pp. 397-406. [10.1016/j.wasman.2016.07.025]

Metal removal from Municipal Solid Waste Incineration fly ash: A comparison between chemical leaching and bioleaching

FUNARI, VALERIO;BRAGA, ROBERTO;DINELLI, ENRICO;
2017

Abstract

Bio- and hydrometallurgical experimental setups at 2-l reactor scale for the processing of fly ash from municipal waste incinerators were explored. We aimed to compare chemical H2SO4 leaching and bioleaching; the latter involved the use of H2SO4 and a mixed culture of acidophilic bacteria. The leaching yields of several elements, including some of those considered as critical (Mg, Co, Ce, Cr, Ga, Nb, Nd, Sb and Sm), are provided. At the end of the experiments, both leaching methods resulted in comparable yields for Mg and Zn (>90%), Al and Mn (>85%), Cr (∼65%), Ga (∼60%), and Ce (∼50%). Chemical leaching showed the best yields for Cu (95%), Fe (91%), and Ni (93%), whereas bioleaching was effective for Nd (76%), Pb (59%), and Co (55%). The two leaching methods generated solids of different quality with respect to the original material as we removed and significantly reduced the metals amounts, and enriched solutions where metals can be recovered for example as mixed salts for further treatment. Compared to chemical leaching the bioleaching halved the use of H2SO4, i.e., a part of agent costs, as a likely consequence of bio-produced acid and improved metal solubility.
2017
Metal removal from Municipal Solid Waste Incineration fly ash: A comparison between chemical leaching and bioleaching / Funari, V.; Mäkinen, J.; Salminen, J.; Braga, R; Dinelli, E.; Revitzer, H.. - In: WASTE MANAGEMENT. - ISSN 0956-053X. - STAMPA. - 60:(2017), pp. 397-406. [10.1016/j.wasman.2016.07.025]
Funari, V.; Mäkinen, J.; Salminen, J.; Braga, R; Dinelli, E.; Revitzer, H.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Dinelli_WasteMan_MetalRemoval.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione 967.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
967.91 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/579977
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 122
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 110
social impact