The paper examines the intellectual relationship of Roland Barthes with some Italian authors in the 1950s and 1960s. First, some letters by Barthes with the poet and intellectual Franco Fortini are explored in order to reconsider also the role of two Marxist literary reviews, such as Ragionamenti and Arguments, which collaborate together during the post-Stalinism crisis. Then, we focus on the breakdown between Barthes and Fortini and the role played by Pier Paolo Pasolini’s idea of “abjuration” of the past concerning Barthes’s relationship with institutional powers and his auto-critique. The final comparison of mythological analysis by Barthes with the whole semiological experience of Umberto Eco shows the theoretical and literary connections between Barthes’s work and some Eco’s writing (e.g. Diario minimo).
Gallerani, G.M. (2016). Roland Barthes contesté: Franco Fortini, Pier Paolo Pasolini, Umberto Eco. REVUE BELGE DE PHILOLOGIE ET D'HISTOIRE, 94(3), 597-610.
Roland Barthes contesté: Franco Fortini, Pier Paolo Pasolini, Umberto Eco
GALLERANI, GUIDO MATTIA
2016
Abstract
The paper examines the intellectual relationship of Roland Barthes with some Italian authors in the 1950s and 1960s. First, some letters by Barthes with the poet and intellectual Franco Fortini are explored in order to reconsider also the role of two Marxist literary reviews, such as Ragionamenti and Arguments, which collaborate together during the post-Stalinism crisis. Then, we focus on the breakdown between Barthes and Fortini and the role played by Pier Paolo Pasolini’s idea of “abjuration” of the past concerning Barthes’s relationship with institutional powers and his auto-critique. The final comparison of mythological analysis by Barthes with the whole semiological experience of Umberto Eco shows the theoretical and literary connections between Barthes’s work and some Eco’s writing (e.g. Diario minimo).I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.