Background: To date, delirium prevalence in adult acute hospital populations has been estimated generally from pooled findings of single-center studies and/or among specific patient populations. Furthermore, the number of participants in these studies has not exceeded a few hundred. To overcome these limitations, we have determined, in a multicenter study, the prevalence of delirium over a single day among a large population of patients admitted to acute and rehabilitation hospital wards in Italy. Methods: This is a point prevalence study (called "Delirium Day") including 1867 older patients (aged 65 years or more) across 108 acute and 12 rehabilitation wards in Italian hospitals. Delirium was assessed on the same day in all patients using the 4AT, a validated and briefly administered tool which does not require training. We also collected data regarding motoric subtypes of delirium, functional and nutritional status, dementia, comorbidity, medications, feeding tubes, peripheral venous and urinary catheters, and physical restraints. Results: The mean sample age was 82.0 ± 7.5 years (58 % female). Overall, 429 patients (22.9 %) had delirium. Hypoactive was the commonest subtype (132/344 patients, 38.5 %), followed by mixed, hyperactive, and nonmotoric delirium. The prevalence was highest in Neurology (28.5 %) and Geriatrics (24.7 %), lowest in Rehabilitation (14.0 %), and intermediate in Orthopedic (20.6 %) and Internal Medicine wards (21.4 %). In a multivariable logistic regression, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05), Activities of Daily Living dependence (OR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.12-1.27), dementia (OR 3.25, 95 % CI 2.41-4.38), malnutrition (OR 2.01, 95 % CI 1.29-3.14), and use of antipsychotics (OR 2.03, 95 % CI 1.45-2.82), feeding tubes (OR 2.51, 95 % CI 1.11-5.66), peripheral venous catheters (OR 1.41, 95 % CI 1.06-1.87), urinary catheters (OR 1.73, 95 % CI 1.30-2.29), and physical restraints (OR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.40-2.40) were associated with delirium. Admission to Neurology wards was also associated with delirium (OR 2.00, 95 % CI 1.29-3.14), while admission to other settings was not. Conclusions: Delirium occurred in more than one out of five patients in acute and rehabilitation hospital wards. Prevalence was highest in Neurology and lowest in Rehabilitation divisions. The "Delirium Day" project might become a useful method to assess delirium across hospital settings and a benchmarking platform for future surveys.

“Delirium Day”: a nationwide point prevalence study of delirium in older hospitalized patients using an easy standardized diagnostic tool

Marco Zoli
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Paola Forti
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Rita Maria Melotti
Investigation
2016

Abstract

Background: To date, delirium prevalence in adult acute hospital populations has been estimated generally from pooled findings of single-center studies and/or among specific patient populations. Furthermore, the number of participants in these studies has not exceeded a few hundred. To overcome these limitations, we have determined, in a multicenter study, the prevalence of delirium over a single day among a large population of patients admitted to acute and rehabilitation hospital wards in Italy. Methods: This is a point prevalence study (called "Delirium Day") including 1867 older patients (aged 65 years or more) across 108 acute and 12 rehabilitation wards in Italian hospitals. Delirium was assessed on the same day in all patients using the 4AT, a validated and briefly administered tool which does not require training. We also collected data regarding motoric subtypes of delirium, functional and nutritional status, dementia, comorbidity, medications, feeding tubes, peripheral venous and urinary catheters, and physical restraints. Results: The mean sample age was 82.0 ± 7.5 years (58 % female). Overall, 429 patients (22.9 %) had delirium. Hypoactive was the commonest subtype (132/344 patients, 38.5 %), followed by mixed, hyperactive, and nonmotoric delirium. The prevalence was highest in Neurology (28.5 %) and Geriatrics (24.7 %), lowest in Rehabilitation (14.0 %), and intermediate in Orthopedic (20.6 %) and Internal Medicine wards (21.4 %). In a multivariable logistic regression, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05), Activities of Daily Living dependence (OR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.12-1.27), dementia (OR 3.25, 95 % CI 2.41-4.38), malnutrition (OR 2.01, 95 % CI 1.29-3.14), and use of antipsychotics (OR 2.03, 95 % CI 1.45-2.82), feeding tubes (OR 2.51, 95 % CI 1.11-5.66), peripheral venous catheters (OR 1.41, 95 % CI 1.06-1.87), urinary catheters (OR 1.73, 95 % CI 1.30-2.29), and physical restraints (OR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.40-2.40) were associated with delirium. Admission to Neurology wards was also associated with delirium (OR 2.00, 95 % CI 1.29-3.14), while admission to other settings was not. Conclusions: Delirium occurred in more than one out of five patients in acute and rehabilitation hospital wards. Prevalence was highest in Neurology and lowest in Rehabilitation divisions. The "Delirium Day" project might become a useful method to assess delirium across hospital settings and a benchmarking platform for future surveys.
2016
Giuseppe Bellelli; Alessandro Morandi; Simona G. Di Santo; Andrea Mazzone; Antonio Cherubini; Enrico Mossello; Mario Bo; Angelo Bianchetti; Renzo Rozzini; Ermellina Zanetti; Massimo Musicco; Alberto Ferrari; Nicola Ferrara; Marco Trabucchi; and on behalf of the Italian Study Group on Delirium (ISGoD); Stefano Boffelli; Fabio Di Stefano; Francesco De Filippi; Fabio Guerini; Erik Bertoletti; Albert March; Alessandro Margiotta; Patrizia Mecocci; Desireè Addesi; Fausto Fantò; Gianluca Isaia; Babette Dijik; Paola Porrino; Antonino Maria Cotroneo; Giovanni Galli; Amalia Cecilia Bruni; Bruno Bernardini; Carla Corsini; Annachiara Cagnin; Amedeo Zurlo; Giuseppe Barbagallo; Maria Lia Lunardelli; Emilio Martini; Giuseppe Battaglia; Raffaele Latella; Donatella Petritola; Elena Sinforiani; Alberto Cester; Marino Formilan; Pasqualina Carbone; Ildebrando Appollonio; Diletta Cereda; Lucio Tremolizzo; Edo Bottacchi; Lucio Lucchetti; Claudio Mariani; Piero Rapazzini; Giuseppe Romanelli; Alessandra Marengoni; Giovanni Zuliani; Lara Bianchi; Teresa Suardi; Ettore Muti; Renato Bottura; Giovanni Sgrò; Antonella Mandas; Luca Serchisu; Patrizia Crippa; Claudio Ivaldi; Andrea Ungar; Daniele Villani; Clara Raimondi; Chiara Mussi; Giancarlo Isaia; Giuseppe Provenzano; Daniela Mari; Patrizio Odetti; Fiammetta Monacelli; Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi; Alice Pluderi; Claudio Bellamoli; Luciano Terranova; Elio Scarpini; Ferdinando D'Amico; Maria Chiara Cavallini; Gianbattista Guerrini; Anna Maria Scotuzzi; Antonino Chiarello; Alberto Pilotto; Sara Tognini; Giuseppina Dell’Aquila; Gabriele Toigo; Giuliano Ceschia; Maristella Piccinini; Andrea Fabbo; Marco Zoli; Paola Forti; Christian Wenter; Giorgio Basile; Anna Lasagni; Alessandro Padovani; Luca Rozzini; Maria Cottino; Silvia Vitali; Gabriele Tripi; Stefano Avanzi; Giorgio Annoni; Giovanni Ruotolo; Federica Boschi; Paolo Bonino; Niccolò Marchionni; Maria C. Cavallini; Sara Fascendini; Gabriele Noro; Renato Turco; Maria C. Ubezio; Carlo Serrati; Maria Infante; Simona Gentile; Luigi M. Pernigotti; Carlo A. Biagini; Enzo Canonico; Pietro Bonati; Pietro Gareri; Paolo Caffarra; Arcangelo Ceretti; Rosanna Castiglia; Carlo Gabelli; Mario Lo Storto; Paolo Putzu; Giuseppe Bellelli; Alessandro Morandi; Simona Di Santo; Andrea;Mazzone; Renzo Rozzini; Ermellina Zanetti; Angelo Bianchetti; Mario Bo; Enrico Mossello; Antonio Cherubini; Nicola Ferrara; Alberto Ferrari; Massimo Musicco; Marco Trabucchi; Rita Maria Melotti
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
85. BMC 2016.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 674.51 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
674.51 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/566837
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 49
  • Scopus 137
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 131
social impact