The present study aimed to explore for the first time the relationship between circadian preference and different decision-making styles. In total, 501 young adults (330 females), with a mean age of 21.07 ± 1.99 years, took part in the study. The participants completed the reduced version of the morningness–eveningness questionnaire (rMEQ) and the general decision-making style inventory (GDMS). The rMEQ enabled to assess the circadian preference, with lower rMEQ scores pointing toward eveningness preference. The GDMS measured five decision-making styles: rational, intuitive, dependent, avoidant and spontaneous. Higher scores on each GDMS decision-making style reflect a higher prevalence of the corresponding style. A set of multiple regression analyses was performed with rMEQ score, gender and age as predictors together with each GDMS decision-making style as dependent variable. rMEQ score proved to be the only significant (negative) predictor of avoidant and spontaneous decision-making styles, i.e. lower rMEQ score (tendency toward eveningness) significantly predicted higher score at these decision-making styles. The present results suggest that eveningness preference is significantly related to avoidant and spontaneous decision-making styles in young adults. Such results will be discussed with reference to the effects of decision-making styles on decision-making in different types of workers and mental health.

Tonetti, L., Fabbri, M., Boreggiani, M., Guastella, P., Martoni, M., Ruiz Herrera, N., et al. (2016). Circadian preference and decision-making styles. BIOLOGICAL RHYTHM RESEARCH, 47(4), 573-581 [10.1080/09291016.2016.1167312].

Circadian preference and decision-making styles

Tonetti, Lorenzo
;
Fabbri, Marco;Boreggiani, Michele;Martoni, Monica;Natale, Vincenzo
2016

Abstract

The present study aimed to explore for the first time the relationship between circadian preference and different decision-making styles. In total, 501 young adults (330 females), with a mean age of 21.07 ± 1.99 years, took part in the study. The participants completed the reduced version of the morningness–eveningness questionnaire (rMEQ) and the general decision-making style inventory (GDMS). The rMEQ enabled to assess the circadian preference, with lower rMEQ scores pointing toward eveningness preference. The GDMS measured five decision-making styles: rational, intuitive, dependent, avoidant and spontaneous. Higher scores on each GDMS decision-making style reflect a higher prevalence of the corresponding style. A set of multiple regression analyses was performed with rMEQ score, gender and age as predictors together with each GDMS decision-making style as dependent variable. rMEQ score proved to be the only significant (negative) predictor of avoidant and spontaneous decision-making styles, i.e. lower rMEQ score (tendency toward eveningness) significantly predicted higher score at these decision-making styles. The present results suggest that eveningness preference is significantly related to avoidant and spontaneous decision-making styles in young adults. Such results will be discussed with reference to the effects of decision-making styles on decision-making in different types of workers and mental health.
2016
Tonetti, L., Fabbri, M., Boreggiani, M., Guastella, P., Martoni, M., Ruiz Herrera, N., et al. (2016). Circadian preference and decision-making styles. BIOLOGICAL RHYTHM RESEARCH, 47(4), 573-581 [10.1080/09291016.2016.1167312].
Tonetti, Lorenzo; Fabbri, Marco; Boreggiani, Michele; Guastella, Pietro; Martoni, Monica; Ruiz Herrera, Noelia; Natale, Vincenzo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Circadian preference and decision-making styles_postprint.pdf

Open Access dal 18/03/2017

Tipo: Postprint / Author's Accepted Manuscript (AAM) - versione accettata per la pubblicazione dopo la peer-review
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 172.19 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
172.19 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/560907
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact