The article describes 7 different models for financing and delivering health care: 1) direct market; 2) voluntary private insurance; 3) social health insurance; 4) residual programs; 5) compulsory national health insurance; 6) universal single-payer system; 7) national health service. The seven models are presented and compared with reference to the following dimensions: who pays for and who benefits from the system; the number of insurers, and the public or private nature of the coverage scheme; the contribution method; users’ freedom of choice; the arrangements between insurers and providers; the role of the State. The typology is applied to 24 OECD countries.
Toth, F. (2016). Non solo Bismarck contro Beveridge: sette modelli di sistema sanitario. RIVISTA ITALIANA DI POLITICHE PUBBLICHE, 11(2), 279-305 [10.1483/83929].
Non solo Bismarck contro Beveridge: sette modelli di sistema sanitario
TOTH, FEDERICO
2016
Abstract
The article describes 7 different models for financing and delivering health care: 1) direct market; 2) voluntary private insurance; 3) social health insurance; 4) residual programs; 5) compulsory national health insurance; 6) universal single-payer system; 7) national health service. The seven models are presented and compared with reference to the following dimensions: who pays for and who benefits from the system; the number of insurers, and the public or private nature of the coverage scheme; the contribution method; users’ freedom of choice; the arrangements between insurers and providers; the role of the State. The typology is applied to 24 OECD countries.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Non solo Bismarck contro Beveridge.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo in rivista
Tipo:
Postprint
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione
240.69 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
240.69 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.