The new debate on communism requires exploring two essential distinctions: the distinction between a political and a philosophical term, and the distinction between experimental and governmental communism. This twofold division, this article argues, has a contemporary urgency, which is based on an assessment of the sixties as well as on the assessment of the historical experience of modern communism that, in turn, the political configuration of the sixties motivates us to make

Alessandro, R. (2014). Communism: An Idea to Be Divided. THE SOUTH ATLANTIC QUARTERLY, 113(4), 729-742 [10.1215/00382876-2803613].

Communism: An Idea to Be Divided

RUSSO, ALESSANDRO
2014

Abstract

The new debate on communism requires exploring two essential distinctions: the distinction between a political and a philosophical term, and the distinction between experimental and governmental communism. This twofold division, this article argues, has a contemporary urgency, which is based on an assessment of the sixties as well as on the assessment of the historical experience of modern communism that, in turn, the political configuration of the sixties motivates us to make
2014
Alessandro, R. (2014). Communism: An Idea to Be Divided. THE SOUTH ATLANTIC QUARTERLY, 113(4), 729-742 [10.1215/00382876-2803613].
Alessandro, Russo
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/555936
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact