The recent study by Gianfranco Tusset is an ambitious attempt to show del Vecchio’s approach at work, through the reconstruction of his contribution to the theory of a monetary economy. Tusset’s starting point is the analysis of the intellectual context of Italian political economy at the turn of the twentieth century, which the author describes as characterised by a strong interest in “economic change”, a view of the economic actor as a “complex agent”, and a methodological disposition towards “scientific realism” (pp. 56). These three focal points are closely intertwined and call for a research horizon in which the analysis of historical change requires a multi-dimensional view of economic actions, and a causal plurality that avoids “any reductionism that might obfuscate the variety of factors influencing economic change” (p. 6). Important building blocks of del Vecchio’s theory of money are the interplay between the individual and the social dimension; the consideration of the monetary economy as a hierarchical arrangement of different “selling groups”; and the investigation of interest and credit as means to adjust the relationship between monetary stocks and flows under the assumption of heterogeneous time horizons for different groups.
Scazzieri, R. (2015). Money as Organization, Gustavo del Vecchio's Theory, by G. Tusset. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT (ONLINE), 23(2), 329-332.
Money as Organization, Gustavo del Vecchio's Theory, by G. Tusset
SCAZZIERI, ROBERTO
2015
Abstract
The recent study by Gianfranco Tusset is an ambitious attempt to show del Vecchio’s approach at work, through the reconstruction of his contribution to the theory of a monetary economy. Tusset’s starting point is the analysis of the intellectual context of Italian political economy at the turn of the twentieth century, which the author describes as characterised by a strong interest in “economic change”, a view of the economic actor as a “complex agent”, and a methodological disposition towards “scientific realism” (pp. 56). These three focal points are closely intertwined and call for a research horizon in which the analysis of historical change requires a multi-dimensional view of economic actions, and a causal plurality that avoids “any reductionism that might obfuscate the variety of factors influencing economic change” (p. 6). Important building blocks of del Vecchio’s theory of money are the interplay between the individual and the social dimension; the consideration of the monetary economy as a hierarchical arrangement of different “selling groups”; and the investigation of interest and credit as means to adjust the relationship between monetary stocks and flows under the assumption of heterogeneous time horizons for different groups.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.