This long-term retrospective study investigated the value of debridement versus debridement and Osteoset T antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate pellets in the treatment of adult chronic osteomyelitis. Sixty-five patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 75months (range:36 to 334). Forty cases were treated by debridement, and 25 by debridement and Osteoset T . The healing rates were 60% and 80%,respectively; however, the difference was not significant. In a subgroup of 39 patients with medullary osteomyelitis and a normal immune system (IA according to the Cierny-Mader classification of adult osteomyelitis), 22 patients were treated with debridement, 17 with debridement and Osteoset T . The healing rates were 59% and 94%, respectively (p<0.05). Twenty-eight patients with Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis were also studied apart; 13 were treated with debridement and 15 with debridement and Osteoset T . The healing rates were 46% and 80%, respectively. The difference was not significant. The results obtained with debridement were less good than with debridement plus Osteoset T, but the difference was not significant,except in a single subgroup. Osteoset T obviates the need for removal, which is the rule after implantation of gentamycin beads. Bony ingrowth is however limited.

W. Chang, M. Colangeli, S. Colangeli, C. Di Bella , E. Gozzi, D. Donati (2007). Adult osteomyelitis: debridement versus debridement plus Osteoset T pellets. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, Apr, 73(2), 238-243.

Adult osteomyelitis: debridement versus debridement plus Osteoset T pellets

DONATI, DAVIDE MARIA
2007

Abstract

This long-term retrospective study investigated the value of debridement versus debridement and Osteoset T antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate pellets in the treatment of adult chronic osteomyelitis. Sixty-five patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 75months (range:36 to 334). Forty cases were treated by debridement, and 25 by debridement and Osteoset T . The healing rates were 60% and 80%,respectively; however, the difference was not significant. In a subgroup of 39 patients with medullary osteomyelitis and a normal immune system (IA according to the Cierny-Mader classification of adult osteomyelitis), 22 patients were treated with debridement, 17 with debridement and Osteoset T . The healing rates were 59% and 94%, respectively (p<0.05). Twenty-eight patients with Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis were also studied apart; 13 were treated with debridement and 15 with debridement and Osteoset T . The healing rates were 46% and 80%, respectively. The difference was not significant. The results obtained with debridement were less good than with debridement plus Osteoset T, but the difference was not significant,except in a single subgroup. Osteoset T obviates the need for removal, which is the rule after implantation of gentamycin beads. Bony ingrowth is however limited.
2007
W. Chang, M. Colangeli, S. Colangeli, C. Di Bella , E. Gozzi, D. Donati (2007). Adult osteomyelitis: debridement versus debridement plus Osteoset T pellets. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, Apr, 73(2), 238-243.
W. Chang; M. Colangeli; S. Colangeli; C. Di Bella ; E. Gozzi; D. Donati
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/55347
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 85
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 71
social impact