Background: In the past decades, many new insights and best practices in palliative care, a relatively new field in health care, have been published. However, this knowledge is often not implemented. The aim of this study therefore was to identify strategies to implement improvement activities identified in a research project within daily palliative care practice. Methods: A nominal group technique was used with members of the IMPACT consortium, being international researchers and clinicians in cancer care, dementia care and palliative care. Participants identified and prioritized implementation strategies. Data was analyzed qualitatively using inductive coding. Results: Twenty international clinicians and researchers participated in one of two parallel nominal group sessions. The recommended strategies to implement results from a research project were grouped in five common themes: 1. Dissemination of results e.g. by publishing results tailored to relevant audiences, 2. Identification and dissemination of unique selling points, 3. education e.g. by developing e-learning tools and integrating scientific evidence into core curricula, 4. Stimulation of participation of stakeholders, and 5. consideration of consequences e.g. rewarding services for their implementation successes but not services that fail to implement quality improvement activities. Discussion: The added value of this nominal group study lies in the prioritisation by the experts of strategies to influence the implementation of quality improvement activities in palliative care. Efforts to ensure future use of scientific findings should be built into research projects in order to prevent waste of resources.

Van Riet Paap, J., Vissers, K., Iliffe, S., Radbruch, L., Hjermstad, M.J., Chattat, R., et al. (2015). Strategies to implement evidence into practice to improve palliative care: Recommendations of a nominal group approach with expert opinion leaders Ethics, organization and policy. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 14(1), 1-6 [10.1186/s12904-015-0044-9].

Strategies to implement evidence into practice to improve palliative care: Recommendations of a nominal group approach with expert opinion leaders Ethics, organization and policy

CHATTAT, RABIH;
2015

Abstract

Background: In the past decades, many new insights and best practices in palliative care, a relatively new field in health care, have been published. However, this knowledge is often not implemented. The aim of this study therefore was to identify strategies to implement improvement activities identified in a research project within daily palliative care practice. Methods: A nominal group technique was used with members of the IMPACT consortium, being international researchers and clinicians in cancer care, dementia care and palliative care. Participants identified and prioritized implementation strategies. Data was analyzed qualitatively using inductive coding. Results: Twenty international clinicians and researchers participated in one of two parallel nominal group sessions. The recommended strategies to implement results from a research project were grouped in five common themes: 1. Dissemination of results e.g. by publishing results tailored to relevant audiences, 2. Identification and dissemination of unique selling points, 3. education e.g. by developing e-learning tools and integrating scientific evidence into core curricula, 4. Stimulation of participation of stakeholders, and 5. consideration of consequences e.g. rewarding services for their implementation successes but not services that fail to implement quality improvement activities. Discussion: The added value of this nominal group study lies in the prioritisation by the experts of strategies to influence the implementation of quality improvement activities in palliative care. Efforts to ensure future use of scientific findings should be built into research projects in order to prevent waste of resources.
2015
Van Riet Paap, J., Vissers, K., Iliffe, S., Radbruch, L., Hjermstad, M.J., Chattat, R., et al. (2015). Strategies to implement evidence into practice to improve palliative care: Recommendations of a nominal group approach with expert opinion leaders Ethics, organization and policy. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 14(1), 1-6 [10.1186/s12904-015-0044-9].
Van Riet Paap, Jasper; Vissers, Kris; Iliffe, Steve; Radbruch, Lukas; Hjermstad, Marianne J.; Chattat, Rabih; Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra; Engels, Yvonne...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
strategies for palliative care.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 385.88 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
385.88 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/553246
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact