The meat processing is a labor-intensive industry dealing with manual handling of heavy loads of meat at high frequency. Meat processing workers are under pressure to maintain high rates of work, performing arduous repetitive movements while keeping awkward postures. This paper presents the study of an Italian ham processing company. The ergonomic risk assessment reveals that manual material handling and repetitive tasks expose deboning line workers to high physical risk. The reference manual ham-deboning line is introduced, together with the semi-automatic ham-deboning line proposal. Particularly, the new layout proposal involves the adoption of a semi-automatic ham-deboning machine. The characteristics of the meat processing industry and the features of the work environment are analyzed before the study of the new layout proposal. The feasibility study encompasses the cost of the semi-automatic deboning line proposal, including the non-safety cost analysis. Results reveal the positive impact of the semi-automatic ham-deboning system on the company's profitability. As a consequence, automated technology leads to economic and ergonomic benefits for workers, employers and customers, improving the product quality, hygiene and security.

Improving ergonomics in the meat industry: A case study of an Italian ham processing company / Botti, Lucia; Mora, Cristina; Regattieri, Alberto. - ELETTRONICO. - 48:3(2015), pp. 598-603. (Intervento presentato al convegno 15th IFAC/IEEE/IFIP/IFORS Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing INCOM 2015 tenutosi a Ottawa, Canada nel 11-13 may 2015) [10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.147].

Improving ergonomics in the meat industry: A case study of an Italian ham processing company

BOTTI, LUCIA;MORA, CRISTINA;REGATTIERI, ALBERTO
2015

Abstract

The meat processing is a labor-intensive industry dealing with manual handling of heavy loads of meat at high frequency. Meat processing workers are under pressure to maintain high rates of work, performing arduous repetitive movements while keeping awkward postures. This paper presents the study of an Italian ham processing company. The ergonomic risk assessment reveals that manual material handling and repetitive tasks expose deboning line workers to high physical risk. The reference manual ham-deboning line is introduced, together with the semi-automatic ham-deboning line proposal. Particularly, the new layout proposal involves the adoption of a semi-automatic ham-deboning machine. The characteristics of the meat processing industry and the features of the work environment are analyzed before the study of the new layout proposal. The feasibility study encompasses the cost of the semi-automatic deboning line proposal, including the non-safety cost analysis. Results reveal the positive impact of the semi-automatic ham-deboning system on the company's profitability. As a consequence, automated technology leads to economic and ergonomic benefits for workers, employers and customers, improving the product quality, hygiene and security.
2015
Proceedings of 15th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing INCOM 2015
598
603
Improving ergonomics in the meat industry: A case study of an Italian ham processing company / Botti, Lucia; Mora, Cristina; Regattieri, Alberto. - ELETTRONICO. - 48:3(2015), pp. 598-603. (Intervento presentato al convegno 15th IFAC/IEEE/IFIP/IFORS Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing INCOM 2015 tenutosi a Ottawa, Canada nel 11-13 may 2015) [10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.147].
Botti, Lucia; Mora, Cristina; Regattieri, Alberto
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/552781
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact