The relations between profit-making businesses alter in the sense that the common “training process” means a progressive business culture alignment initially as an attempt, whose final result is difficult to foresee at the outset, to a change in anthropological culture, too (Catturi, 2001). Indeed, we are not dealing with a question of applying or not a generalised or random social responsibility, whose image in the businesses, who do apply it, greatly improves, instead it is a question of having also only some businesses, who may belong to certain projects (Baldarelli, 2005a), where, by means of applying social responsibility, the anthropological culture is altered. This signifies a wider openness towards dialogue with all other typologies of business, profit-making ones, non profit-making ones, both public and private ones, in order to be a symbol of real dialogue which is capable of both creating wealth and improving the quality of life . The applying of CSR is not enough, as was stated at the time but the authentic application is needed, as well as the capacity for dialogue with other types of bodies which are far from the thinking behind CSR! It is interesting to think in this way while considering the mixed aggregates of profit- and non profit-making businesses. The former are very often convinced of being able to do without the latter, but really they have always been there and have anticipated the present capitalistic era. Mixed-type aggregates of both businesses are created today, because, Alas!, they seem not to be able to do without one another, so what does profit have to do with all this? The term mixed indicates the intensity of relationships that intertwine both types of company and also for those relationships that there are between the profit-making aggregate: “for profit group” and the non profit-making aggregate, it is the world of Civil Economics which buds forth.
M. G. Baldarelli (2007). New perspectives in inter-company relations, social responsibility, (CSR) and social, ethical and environmental accounting in Italy by way of the government CSR-SC project: theory and praxis. ECONOMIA AZIENDALE 2000 WEB, 1.2007, 1-16.
New perspectives in inter-company relations, social responsibility, (CSR) and social, ethical and environmental accounting in Italy by way of the government CSR-SC project: theory and praxis
BALDARELLI, MARIA-GABRIELLA
2007
Abstract
The relations between profit-making businesses alter in the sense that the common “training process” means a progressive business culture alignment initially as an attempt, whose final result is difficult to foresee at the outset, to a change in anthropological culture, too (Catturi, 2001). Indeed, we are not dealing with a question of applying or not a generalised or random social responsibility, whose image in the businesses, who do apply it, greatly improves, instead it is a question of having also only some businesses, who may belong to certain projects (Baldarelli, 2005a), where, by means of applying social responsibility, the anthropological culture is altered. This signifies a wider openness towards dialogue with all other typologies of business, profit-making ones, non profit-making ones, both public and private ones, in order to be a symbol of real dialogue which is capable of both creating wealth and improving the quality of life . The applying of CSR is not enough, as was stated at the time but the authentic application is needed, as well as the capacity for dialogue with other types of bodies which are far from the thinking behind CSR! It is interesting to think in this way while considering the mixed aggregates of profit- and non profit-making businesses. The former are very often convinced of being able to do without the latter, but really they have always been there and have anticipated the present capitalistic era. Mixed-type aggregates of both businesses are created today, because, Alas!, they seem not to be able to do without one another, so what does profit have to do with all this? The term mixed indicates the intensity of relationships that intertwine both types of company and also for those relationships that there are between the profit-making aggregate: “for profit group” and the non profit-making aggregate, it is the world of Civil Economics which buds forth.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
