Conf. 10,8,15 provides an example of a consecutive clause within a direct question; this is a rare syntactic pattern that nonetheless has some occurrences in classical or pagan authors like Cicero, Pliny the Elder, Tacitus. Because of its slightly illogical structure – a subordinate clause turns into an independent one – both scribes and scholars tended to emend the transmitted texts; as for Conf. 10,8,15, the presence of a similar syntactic pattern in a passage belonging to the same context (10,17,26) proves that this is an effective stylistic tool that aims to present doubt as a fundamental step in the ascent toward God
Quod sui non capit: la sintassi del dubbio e la constitutio textus (Aug. conf. 10,8,15)
PIERI, BRUNA
2015
Abstract
Conf. 10,8,15 provides an example of a consecutive clause within a direct question; this is a rare syntactic pattern that nonetheless has some occurrences in classical or pagan authors like Cicero, Pliny the Elder, Tacitus. Because of its slightly illogical structure – a subordinate clause turns into an independent one – both scribes and scholars tended to emend the transmitted texts; as for Conf. 10,8,15, the presence of a similar syntactic pattern in a passage belonging to the same context (10,17,26) proves that this is an effective stylistic tool that aims to present doubt as a fundamental step in the ascent toward GodFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
109-PieriPaideia2015.pdf
Open Access dal 01/01/2018
Descrizione: Pdf del contributo con indice della rivista
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione
376.69 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
376.69 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.