Cultivar, soil type, nitrogen source and irrigation regimes as quality determinants of organically grown tomatoes

Organic farming is claimed to be more sustainable and to produce fruits and vegetables that are healthier than conventional farming. However, scientific evidence in support of such claims is rather scarce. With respect to the nutritional aspects of organic products, there is a broad variability of responses in terms of accumulation of valuable molecules under organic cultivation so that it is not possible to establish unequivocal links between farming system and production of these metabolites. Considering that there is a physiological potential of organic products to systematically accumulate nutritional metabolites in response to this specific farming system, we began to categorize those cultural conditions that may facilitate the expression of such potential. In three different experiments carried out over three years, here we address the effect of cultivar, N fertilization, irrigation regime and soil texture on yield and quality parameters of organically grown tomatoes. Although yield was generally higher in conventional farming, there were not much yield differences between the two farming systems under low N fertilization and different irrigation levels. In addition, the sandy soil seemed to be more appropriate than clayey soil to obtain a competitive yield in organic tomato. Cultivars may respond differently in terms of accumulation of antioxidant molecules. Moreover, under organic farming, the level of these molecules was tightly dependent on the growing season. Overall, under limiting agricultural inputs (low N and water), organic farming may have a competitive advantage vs. conventional farming in terms of yield and nutritional quality. Nonetheless, in order to achieve significant qualitative improvements, soil type and proper cultivar selection should be considered as key determinants under organic farming.