It can be concluded that under M (in North only) and L scenarios switchgrass may lead to environmental benefits than conventional crop rotations. Comparing inputs levels, H was clearly more impacting than L (+174%) and M (+36%), with the two last scenarios significantly differing only in South. In general, irrigation strongly affected the environmental impact, with differences ranging from 3% to 42% Between North and South.
Fazio S., Monti A., Venturi G. (2007). Life Cycle Assessment of Switchgrass under Variable Scenarios from “Cradle to Farm Gate”. FIRENZE : ETA-Renewable Energies.
Life Cycle Assessment of Switchgrass under Variable Scenarios from “Cradle to Farm Gate”
FAZIO, SIMONE;MONTI, ANDREA;VENTURI, GIANPIETRO
2007
Abstract
It can be concluded that under M (in North only) and L scenarios switchgrass may lead to environmental benefits than conventional crop rotations. Comparing inputs levels, H was clearly more impacting than L (+174%) and M (+36%), with the two last scenarios significantly differing only in South. In general, irrigation strongly affected the environmental impact, with differences ranging from 3% to 42% Between North and South.File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.