BACKGROUND: Twenty percent of rectal cancer patients have synchronous distant metastasis at diagnosis. At present, the treatment strategy in this patient setting is not well defined. This study in one institution evaluates the treatment strategy of three different patient groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and July 2011, 65 patients with M1 rectal cancer were evaluated. Three different groups were defined: rectal cancer with resectable metastatic disease (group A); rectal cancer with potentially resectable metastatic disease (group B), and rectal cancer with unresectable metastatic disease (group C). RESULTS: Group A included 11 patients (16.9%), group B 28 patients (43.1%) and group C 26 patients (40%). Forty-three (66.2%) patients underwent surgery for primary rectal cancer, and 30 (46.2%) patients for metastasis resection (23 liver, 4 lung and 3 ovary). Median overall survival (OS) by group was: 51 (5-86; group A), 32 (24-40; group B) and 16 (7-26; group C) months. Patients undergoing metastasis resection have higher median OS than unresected patients (44 vs. 15 months; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment strategy in synchronous metastatic rectal cancer must consider the possibility of distant metastasis resection. Long-term survival can be achieved using an integrated approach.
Pinto, C., Pini, S., Di Fabio, F., Cuicchi, D., Iacopino, B., Lecce, F., et al. (2014). Treatment strategy for rectal cancer with synchronous metastasis: 65 consecutive italian cases from the bologna multidisciplinary rectal cancer group. ONCOLOGY, 86(3), 135-142 [10.1159/000357782].
Treatment strategy for rectal cancer with synchronous metastasis: 65 consecutive italian cases from the bologna multidisciplinary rectal cancer group
CUICCHI, DAJANA;LECCE, FERDINANDO;ERCOLANI, GIORGIO;DE RAFFELE, EMILIO;STELLA, FRANCO;PINNA, ANTONIO DANIELE;COLA, BRUNO
2014
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Twenty percent of rectal cancer patients have synchronous distant metastasis at diagnosis. At present, the treatment strategy in this patient setting is not well defined. This study in one institution evaluates the treatment strategy of three different patient groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and July 2011, 65 patients with M1 rectal cancer were evaluated. Three different groups were defined: rectal cancer with resectable metastatic disease (group A); rectal cancer with potentially resectable metastatic disease (group B), and rectal cancer with unresectable metastatic disease (group C). RESULTS: Group A included 11 patients (16.9%), group B 28 patients (43.1%) and group C 26 patients (40%). Forty-three (66.2%) patients underwent surgery for primary rectal cancer, and 30 (46.2%) patients for metastasis resection (23 liver, 4 lung and 3 ovary). Median overall survival (OS) by group was: 51 (5-86; group A), 32 (24-40; group B) and 16 (7-26; group C) months. Patients undergoing metastasis resection have higher median OS than unresected patients (44 vs. 15 months; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment strategy in synchronous metastatic rectal cancer must consider the possibility of distant metastasis resection. Long-term survival can be achieved using an integrated approach.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
