This paper offers a new logical machinery for reasoning about interpretive canons. We identify some options for modelling reasoning about interpretations and show that interpretative argumentation has a distinctive structure where the claim that a legal text ought or may be interpreted in a certain way can be supported or attacked by arguments, whose conflicts may have to be assessed according to further arguments.
Rotolo, A., Governatori, G., Sartor, G. (2015). Deontic Defeasible Reasoning in Legal Interpretation: Two Options for Modelling Interpretive Arguments [10.1145/2746090.2746100].
Deontic Defeasible Reasoning in Legal Interpretation: Two Options for Modelling Interpretive Arguments
ROTOLO, ANTONINO;GOVERNATORI, GUIDO;SARTOR, GIOVANNI
2015
Abstract
This paper offers a new logical machinery for reasoning about interpretive canons. We identify some options for modelling reasoning about interpretations and show that interpretative argumentation has a distinctive structure where the claim that a legal text ought or may be interpreted in a certain way can be supported or attacked by arguments, whose conflicts may have to be assessed according to further arguments.File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
