Research based on event-related potential (ERP) reported mediofrontal negativities following unexpected negative feedback or performance error. Some authors proposed that these signals reflect reward prediction error for worse than expected outcomes, while others suggested that mediofrontal negativities express medial prefrontal cortex coding for unexpected non-occurrence of a predicted outcome, whether worse or better than expected. Many studies found mediofrontal negativities coding for unexpected negative outcomes; however, few studies found them after unexpected positive outcomes. The present study investigated ERP and skin conductance response (SCR) to the unexpected omission of electric shocks during Pavlovian aversive conditioning. To manipulate expectancies, participants were presented with visual stimuli paired with electric shock on either 80% (CS+1) or 20% (CS+2) of trials. SCR analysis confirmed higher shock-delivery expectancy for CS+1, relative to CS+2. ERP analysis evidenced a stronger negative frontocentral ERP component after unexpected, relative to expected, shock-omission. Methodological and theoretical implications are discussed.

Sara Garofalo, Martin E. Maier, Giuseppe di Pellegrino (2014). Mediofrontal negativity signals unexpected omission of aversive events. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 4, 1-7 [10.1038/srep04816].

Mediofrontal negativity signals unexpected omission of aversive events

Sara Garofalo;Giuseppe di Pellegrino
2014

Abstract

Research based on event-related potential (ERP) reported mediofrontal negativities following unexpected negative feedback or performance error. Some authors proposed that these signals reflect reward prediction error for worse than expected outcomes, while others suggested that mediofrontal negativities express medial prefrontal cortex coding for unexpected non-occurrence of a predicted outcome, whether worse or better than expected. Many studies found mediofrontal negativities coding for unexpected negative outcomes; however, few studies found them after unexpected positive outcomes. The present study investigated ERP and skin conductance response (SCR) to the unexpected omission of electric shocks during Pavlovian aversive conditioning. To manipulate expectancies, participants were presented with visual stimuli paired with electric shock on either 80% (CS+1) or 20% (CS+2) of trials. SCR analysis confirmed higher shock-delivery expectancy for CS+1, relative to CS+2. ERP analysis evidenced a stronger negative frontocentral ERP component after unexpected, relative to expected, shock-omission. Methodological and theoretical implications are discussed.
2014
Sara Garofalo, Martin E. Maier, Giuseppe di Pellegrino (2014). Mediofrontal negativity signals unexpected omission of aversive events. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 4, 1-7 [10.1038/srep04816].
Sara Garofalo;Martin E. Maier;Giuseppe di Pellegrino
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Garofalo_SR_14.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Condividi allo stesso modo (CCBYNCSA)
Dimensione 609.88 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
609.88 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/523203
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 23
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact