In the present study, an accurate comparison between results by pushover methodology for RC frame structures and Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) has been performed. Fifty artificially generated spectrum-compatible time-histories have been employed to perform incremental dynamic analyses. Different pushover procedures have been analysed: conventional (first-mode distribution, uniform distribution) and displacement-based adaptive pushover analysis (DAP) have been carried out to predict structural behaviour of three frame structures.

Ferracuti B., Pinho R., Savoia M., Francia R. (2007). Pushover versus Incremental Dynamic Analysis. s.l : s.n.

Pushover versus Incremental Dynamic Analysis

FERRACUTI, BARBARA;SAVOIA, MARCO;
2007

Abstract

In the present study, an accurate comparison between results by pushover methodology for RC frame structures and Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) has been performed. Fifty artificially generated spectrum-compatible time-histories have been employed to perform incremental dynamic analyses. Different pushover procedures have been analysed: conventional (first-mode distribution, uniform distribution) and displacement-based adaptive pushover analysis (DAP) have been carried out to predict structural behaviour of three frame structures.
2007
Atti del XII Convegno Nazionale di Ingegneria Sismica, ANIDIS
1
12
Ferracuti B., Pinho R., Savoia M., Francia R. (2007). Pushover versus Incremental Dynamic Analysis. s.l : s.n.
Ferracuti B.; Pinho R.; Savoia M.; Francia R.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/43031
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact