The essay explores Shelley’s stance on the verbal medium, by examining his two ways of considering language. On one hand, Shelley’s language appears to have primarily communicative purposes and, in his more political output, serves as a vehicle to reach the lower classes, exhort them, and ultimately set them free from linguistic hegemonic policies aimed at subordinating them. On the other hand, Shelley’s discourse seems to be directed towards a self-referential reflection, in which the linguistic medium comes to be regarded as an obscure and arbitrary code that imprisons thought – and consequently artistic conception – in artificial patterns that the poet needs to dismantle in order to re-establish a direct connection between his original conception and verbal expression. While his poems show this dual implication, his aesthetic manifesto, A Defence of Poetry, reveals Shelley’s problematic approach to the standard linguistic code, which in the final analysis the poet abandons in favour of a language originating from analogical and metaphorical relationships, able to revive the dead bound between sign and referent.

Fabio Liberto (2010). The Politics of Language in P.B. Shelley. LA QUESTIONE ROMANTICA, 2, 43-59.

The Politics of Language in P.B. Shelley

LIBERTO, FABIO
2010

Abstract

The essay explores Shelley’s stance on the verbal medium, by examining his two ways of considering language. On one hand, Shelley’s language appears to have primarily communicative purposes and, in his more political output, serves as a vehicle to reach the lower classes, exhort them, and ultimately set them free from linguistic hegemonic policies aimed at subordinating them. On the other hand, Shelley’s discourse seems to be directed towards a self-referential reflection, in which the linguistic medium comes to be regarded as an obscure and arbitrary code that imprisons thought – and consequently artistic conception – in artificial patterns that the poet needs to dismantle in order to re-establish a direct connection between his original conception and verbal expression. While his poems show this dual implication, his aesthetic manifesto, A Defence of Poetry, reveals Shelley’s problematic approach to the standard linguistic code, which in the final analysis the poet abandons in favour of a language originating from analogical and metaphorical relationships, able to revive the dead bound between sign and referent.
2010
Fabio Liberto (2010). The Politics of Language in P.B. Shelley. LA QUESTIONE ROMANTICA, 2, 43-59.
Fabio Liberto
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/413770
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact