Purpose: To compare 3 T elliptical-centric CE MRA with 3 T TOF MRA for the detection and characterizationof unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs), by using digital subtracted angiography (DSA) as reference.Materials and methods: Twenty-nine patients (12 male, 17 female; mean age: 62 years) with 41 aneurysms(34 saccular, 7 fusiform; mean diameter: 8.85 mm [range 2.0–26.4 mm]) were evaluated with MRA at3 T each underwent 3D TOF-MRA examination without contrast and then a 3D contrast-enhanced (CE-MRA) examination with 0.1 mmol/kg bodyweight gadobenate dimeglumine and k-space elliptic mapping(Contrast ENhanced Timing Robust Angiography [CENTRA]). Both TOF and CE-MRA images were used toevaluate morphologic features that impact the risk of rupture and the selection of a treatment. Almosthalf (20/41) of UIAs were located in the internal carotid artery, 7 in the anterior communicating artery,9 in the middle cerebral artery and 4 in the vertebro-basilar arterial system.All patients also underwent DSA before or after the MR examination.Results: The CE-MRA results were in all cases consistent with the DSA dataset. No differences werenoted between 3D TOF-MRA and CE-MRA concerning the detection and location of the 41 aneurysmsor visualization of the parental artery. Differences were apparent concerning the visualization of mor-phologic features, especially for large aneurysms (>13 mm). An irregular sac shape was demonstratedfor 21 aneurysms on CE-MRA but only 13/21 aneurysms on 3D TOF-MRA. Likewise, CE-MRA permittedvisualization of an aneurismal neck and calculation of the sac/neck ratio for all 34 aneurysms with aneck demonstrated at DSA. Conversely, a neck was visible for only 24/34 aneurysms at 3D TOF-MRA. 3DCE-MRA detected 15 aneurysms with branches originating from the sac and/or neck, whereas brancheswere recognized in only 12/15 aneurysms at 3D TOF-MRA.Conclusion: For evaluation of intracranial aneurysms at 3 T, 3D CE-MRA is superior to 3D TOF-MRA forassessment of sac shape, detection of aneurysmal neck, and visualization of branches originating fromthe sac or neck itself, if the size of the aneurysm is greater than 13 mm. 3 T 3D CE-MRA is as accurate andeffective as DSA for the evaluation of UIAs.
Mario Cirillo, Francesco Scomazzoni, Luigi Cirillo, Marcello Cadioli, Franco Simionato, Antonella Iadanza, et al. (2013). Comparison of 3D TOF-MRA and 3D CE-MRA at 3 T for imaging of intracranial aneurysms. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 82, e853-e859 [10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.052].
Comparison of 3D TOF-MRA and 3D CE-MRA at 3 T for imaging of intracranial aneurysms
CIRILLO, LUIGI;
2013
Abstract
Purpose: To compare 3 T elliptical-centric CE MRA with 3 T TOF MRA for the detection and characterizationof unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs), by using digital subtracted angiography (DSA) as reference.Materials and methods: Twenty-nine patients (12 male, 17 female; mean age: 62 years) with 41 aneurysms(34 saccular, 7 fusiform; mean diameter: 8.85 mm [range 2.0–26.4 mm]) were evaluated with MRA at3 T each underwent 3D TOF-MRA examination without contrast and then a 3D contrast-enhanced (CE-MRA) examination with 0.1 mmol/kg bodyweight gadobenate dimeglumine and k-space elliptic mapping(Contrast ENhanced Timing Robust Angiography [CENTRA]). Both TOF and CE-MRA images were used toevaluate morphologic features that impact the risk of rupture and the selection of a treatment. Almosthalf (20/41) of UIAs were located in the internal carotid artery, 7 in the anterior communicating artery,9 in the middle cerebral artery and 4 in the vertebro-basilar arterial system.All patients also underwent DSA before or after the MR examination.Results: The CE-MRA results were in all cases consistent with the DSA dataset. No differences werenoted between 3D TOF-MRA and CE-MRA concerning the detection and location of the 41 aneurysmsor visualization of the parental artery. Differences were apparent concerning the visualization of mor-phologic features, especially for large aneurysms (>13 mm). An irregular sac shape was demonstratedfor 21 aneurysms on CE-MRA but only 13/21 aneurysms on 3D TOF-MRA. Likewise, CE-MRA permittedvisualization of an aneurismal neck and calculation of the sac/neck ratio for all 34 aneurysms with aneck demonstrated at DSA. Conversely, a neck was visible for only 24/34 aneurysms at 3D TOF-MRA. 3DCE-MRA detected 15 aneurysms with branches originating from the sac and/or neck, whereas brancheswere recognized in only 12/15 aneurysms at 3D TOF-MRA.Conclusion: For evaluation of intracranial aneurysms at 3 T, 3D CE-MRA is superior to 3D TOF-MRA forassessment of sac shape, detection of aneurysmal neck, and visualization of branches originating fromthe sac or neck itself, if the size of the aneurysm is greater than 13 mm. 3 T 3D CE-MRA is as accurate andeffective as DSA for the evaluation of UIAs.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
