Risk equalisation has been implemented in a number of countries as a means of providing explicit risk-adjusted transfers between health insurance undertakings to improve efficiency within the health insurance market, and make health insurance affordable. Two such countries are Australia and Ireland. In this article, a simulation exercise is carried out to compare the effectiveness of the two countries’ risk equalisation schemes in meeting the policy objectives of encouraging insurers to be efficient and discouraging them from engaging in risk selection. The results of the analysis show that the Australian scheme is less effective than the Irish scheme in reducing the incentive for risk selection and in encouraging insurers to be efficient. The results provide evidence that direct standardisation mechanisms (as used in Ireland) can lead to superior outcomes as compared to indirect standardisation mechanisms (as used in Australia) in terms of promoting efficiency and deterring risk selection.

Risk-equalisation in Australia and Ireland: a simulation analysis to compare outcomes / Armstrong J; Francesco Paolucci. - In: GENEVA PAPERS ON RISK AND INSURANCE-ISSUES AND PRACTICE. - ISSN 1018-5895. - STAMPA. - 35:4(2010), pp. 521-538. [10.1057/gpp.2010.23]

Risk-equalisation in Australia and Ireland: a simulation analysis to compare outcomes

PAOLUCCI, FRANCESCO
2010

Abstract

Risk equalisation has been implemented in a number of countries as a means of providing explicit risk-adjusted transfers between health insurance undertakings to improve efficiency within the health insurance market, and make health insurance affordable. Two such countries are Australia and Ireland. In this article, a simulation exercise is carried out to compare the effectiveness of the two countries’ risk equalisation schemes in meeting the policy objectives of encouraging insurers to be efficient and discouraging them from engaging in risk selection. The results of the analysis show that the Australian scheme is less effective than the Irish scheme in reducing the incentive for risk selection and in encouraging insurers to be efficient. The results provide evidence that direct standardisation mechanisms (as used in Ireland) can lead to superior outcomes as compared to indirect standardisation mechanisms (as used in Australia) in terms of promoting efficiency and deterring risk selection.
2010
Risk-equalisation in Australia and Ireland: a simulation analysis to compare outcomes / Armstrong J; Francesco Paolucci. - In: GENEVA PAPERS ON RISK AND INSURANCE-ISSUES AND PRACTICE. - ISSN 1018-5895. - STAMPA. - 35:4(2010), pp. 521-538. [10.1057/gpp.2010.23]
Armstrong J; Francesco Paolucci
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/399532
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact