In the domain of self-recognition, voice is a critical feature for self/other distinction. The aim of this study was to explore if people have an implicit and/or explicit knowledge of their voice. A group of healthy participants were submitted to an implicit and an explicit self-voice recognition task. They listened to pairs of pre-recorded auditory stimuli (words or pseudowords) pronounced by themselves, by a familiar or an unfamiliar person. Afterwards, in the “Implicit task” participants had to judge whether the pair of stimuli were pronounced by same or different speakers; in the “Explicit task” they had to identify if one of the stimuli was or not their own voice. Results showed a difference between Implicit and Explicit tasks since participants were more accurate in implicit than explicit self voice-recognition. Moreover, in the Implicit task, participants had the same level of accuracy when they had to judge stimuli pronounced with self or others’ voice, whereas when an explicit voice-recognition was required, they were less accurate with self than with others’ voice.

Michela Candini, Elisa Zamagni, Angela Nuzzo, Francesco Ruotolo, Tina Iachini, Francesca Frassinetti (2014). Who is speaking? Implicit and explicit self and other voice recognition. BRAIN AND COGNITION, 92, 112-117 [10.1016/j.bandc.2014.10.001].

Who is speaking? Implicit and explicit self and other voice recognition

CANDINI, MICHELA;FRASSINETTI, FRANCESCA
2014

Abstract

In the domain of self-recognition, voice is a critical feature for self/other distinction. The aim of this study was to explore if people have an implicit and/or explicit knowledge of their voice. A group of healthy participants were submitted to an implicit and an explicit self-voice recognition task. They listened to pairs of pre-recorded auditory stimuli (words or pseudowords) pronounced by themselves, by a familiar or an unfamiliar person. Afterwards, in the “Implicit task” participants had to judge whether the pair of stimuli were pronounced by same or different speakers; in the “Explicit task” they had to identify if one of the stimuli was or not their own voice. Results showed a difference between Implicit and Explicit tasks since participants were more accurate in implicit than explicit self voice-recognition. Moreover, in the Implicit task, participants had the same level of accuracy when they had to judge stimuli pronounced with self or others’ voice, whereas when an explicit voice-recognition was required, they were less accurate with self than with others’ voice.
2014
Michela Candini, Elisa Zamagni, Angela Nuzzo, Francesco Ruotolo, Tina Iachini, Francesca Frassinetti (2014). Who is speaking? Implicit and explicit self and other voice recognition. BRAIN AND COGNITION, 92, 112-117 [10.1016/j.bandc.2014.10.001].
Michela Candini;Elisa Zamagni;Angela Nuzzo;Francesco Ruotolo;Tina Iachini;Francesca Frassinetti
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/395833
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact