Given the complexity of Waste-Water Treatment Plants (WWTPs), both from the environmental, legal and economic point of view, Environmental Decision Support Systems (E-DSSs) are getting wider adoption to monitor and manage the plants in real time. From a cognitive perspective, the knowledge required by an E-DSS may be encoded in different forms. In this paper, we argue that the operational domain and its most relevant concepts should be defined in a proper ontology, providing a vocabulary to encode inferential or operational knowledge in the form of decision-making rules. The rules process information extracted from data, acquired through sensors and possibly processed using predictive or analytic models. Eventually, the rules themselves and the actions they recommend, can be orchestrated as business processes, using workflow models. Moreover, we argue that standard formats should be used to facilitate the formalisation and exchange of knowledge between different systems, including OWL 2 (ontologies), RIF/RuleML (rules), BPMN 2.0 (workflows) and PMML (predictive models). Finally, we present a use case modelling a periodic plant monitoring routine which is necessary to check that the plant emissions are compliant with the national legislation. The system, implemented using the open source Knowledge Integration Platform Drools, exploits a hybrid knowledge base but relies on a unified data model and execution environment.

D. Sottara, S. Bragaglia, P. Mello, D. Pulcini, L. Luccarini, D. Giunchi (2012). Ontologies, rules, workflow and predictive models: Knowledge assets for an EDSS.

Ontologies, rules, workflow and predictive models: Knowledge assets for an EDSS

SOTTARA, DAVIDE;BRAGAGLIA, STEFANO;MELLO, PAOLA;
2012

Abstract

Given the complexity of Waste-Water Treatment Plants (WWTPs), both from the environmental, legal and economic point of view, Environmental Decision Support Systems (E-DSSs) are getting wider adoption to monitor and manage the plants in real time. From a cognitive perspective, the knowledge required by an E-DSS may be encoded in different forms. In this paper, we argue that the operational domain and its most relevant concepts should be defined in a proper ontology, providing a vocabulary to encode inferential or operational knowledge in the form of decision-making rules. The rules process information extracted from data, acquired through sensors and possibly processed using predictive or analytic models. Eventually, the rules themselves and the actions they recommend, can be orchestrated as business processes, using workflow models. Moreover, we argue that standard formats should be used to facilitate the formalisation and exchange of knowledge between different systems, including OWL 2 (ontologies), RIF/RuleML (rules), BPMN 2.0 (workflows) and PMML (predictive models). Finally, we present a use case modelling a periodic plant monitoring routine which is necessary to check that the plant emissions are compliant with the national legislation. The system, implemented using the open source Knowledge Integration Platform Drools, exploits a hybrid knowledge base but relies on a unified data model and execution environment.
2012
iEMSs 2012 - Managing Resources of a Limited Planet: Proceedings of the 6th Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society
204
211
D. Sottara, S. Bragaglia, P. Mello, D. Pulcini, L. Luccarini, D. Giunchi (2012). Ontologies, rules, workflow and predictive models: Knowledge assets for an EDSS.
D. Sottara; S. Bragaglia; P. Mello; D. Pulcini; L. Luccarini; D. Giunchi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/392079
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact