This paper aims to compare Pierpaolo Donati’s Relational Theory of Society (also called Relational Sociology), and the theoretical proposal of Jan Fuhse’s Relational Sociology. It focuses on two main issues: 1) Epistemology – the «Relational Sociology» paradigm; 2) Ontology – what the social relation consists of. Both perspectives (Donati and Fuhse) aim at describing the social reality as a “relational construct”. The core issue and the real distinguishing divergence point between these two theories is precisely the concept of “relation”, then its application in methodological and empirical fields. Fuhse starts with the network analysis sociological tradition (White) to reach a relational “communicative” theory of society (Luhmann), whereas Donati insists to build his sociological paradigm from the perspective of the “relation” concept. The former reduces and considers networks as “communicative events”, the latter does not renounce to analyse social facts as “relations”, synthetizing structure, culture and agency in a wide “relational” social theory.

Fuhse and Donati on Relational Sociology: beyond the structural view of social networks

RUGGIERI Davide
2014

Abstract

This paper aims to compare Pierpaolo Donati’s Relational Theory of Society (also called Relational Sociology), and the theoretical proposal of Jan Fuhse’s Relational Sociology. It focuses on two main issues: 1) Epistemology – the «Relational Sociology» paradigm; 2) Ontology – what the social relation consists of. Both perspectives (Donati and Fuhse) aim at describing the social reality as a “relational construct”. The core issue and the real distinguishing divergence point between these two theories is precisely the concept of “relation”, then its application in methodological and empirical fields. Fuhse starts with the network analysis sociological tradition (White) to reach a relational “communicative” theory of society (Luhmann), whereas Donati insists to build his sociological paradigm from the perspective of the “relation” concept. The former reduces and considers networks as “communicative events”, the latter does not renounce to analyse social facts as “relations”, synthetizing structure, culture and agency in a wide “relational” social theory.
RUGGIERI Davide
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11585/385284
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact