In the past few decades, causation has been the object of increasing philosophical debate involving epistemology, metaphysics, philosophy of science, philosophy of mind, and also philosophical reflections over specific disciplinary fields – e.g. philosophy of physics, biology, law, the social sciences. L.A. Paul and Ned Hall have played a large part in this debate, with a number of contributions – plus the (2004) volume edited with John Collins – focusing in particular on the relation between causation and counterfactuals, and the merits and limits of counterfactual analyses of causation. Causation: A User’s Guide disentangles a number of hard issues arising from contemporary accounts of the nature of causation, and aims to shed light on the intricate web of – sometimes conflicting – intuitions on causation we nurture.
R. Campaner (2014). Review of "Causation: A User's Guide". INTERNATIONAL STUDIES IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 28(2), 221-223.
Review of "Causation: A User's Guide"
CAMPANER, RAFFAELLA
2014
Abstract
In the past few decades, causation has been the object of increasing philosophical debate involving epistemology, metaphysics, philosophy of science, philosophy of mind, and also philosophical reflections over specific disciplinary fields – e.g. philosophy of physics, biology, law, the social sciences. L.A. Paul and Ned Hall have played a large part in this debate, with a number of contributions – plus the (2004) volume edited with John Collins – focusing in particular on the relation between causation and counterfactuals, and the merits and limits of counterfactual analyses of causation. Causation: A User’s Guide disentangles a number of hard issues arising from contemporary accounts of the nature of causation, and aims to shed light on the intricate web of – sometimes conflicting – intuitions on causation we nurture.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.