Septal defects: surgeons do it better.

Until the recent availability of percutaneous devices, the role of the septal defect occluder was played by surgeons. In this paper the pros and cons of the two techniques in the approach to the atrial and ventricular septal defects are analyzed. Although the reported results are rather interesting, it seems clear that one of the crucial aspects to guarantee good results is the selection of patients for the transcatheter approach. Surgery is not confined by the constraints of defect anatomy, and good results may be achieved without regard to patient selection or an otherwise unfavorable anatomy of the defect. Up to now, the follow-up of transcatheter closure has been relatively short and cannot be compared with that of surgery. Therefore, caution should be exercised when proposing the transcatheter approach to septal defects as the true alternative to conventional surgery