Decentralized detection in a network of wireless sensor nodes involves the fusion of information about a phenomenon of interest (PoI) from geographically dispersed nodes. In this paper, we investigate the problem of binary decentralized detection in a dense and randomly deployed wireless sensor network (WSN), whereby the communication channels between the nodes and the fusion center are bandwidth-constrained. We consider a scenario in which sensor observations, conditioned on the alternate hypothesis, are independent but not identically distributed across the sensor nodes.We compare two different fusion architectures, namely, the parallel fusion architecture (PFA) and the cooperative fusion architecture (CFA), for such bandwidthconstrained WSNs, where each sensor node is restricted to send a 1-bit information to the fusion center. For each architecture, we derive expression for the probability of decision error at the fusion center. We propose a consensus flooding protocol for CFA and analyze its average energy consumption. We analyze the effects of PoI intensity, realistic link models, consensus flooding protocol, and network connectivity on the system reliability and average energy consumption for both fusion architectures. We demonstrate that a trade-off exists among spatial diversity gain, average energy consumption, delivery ratio of the consensus flooding protocol, network connectivity, node density, and PoI intensity in CFA. We then provide insight into the design of cooperative WSNs.

Energy effciency of dense wireless sensor networks: To cooperate or not to cooperate

DARDARI, DAVIDE;
2007

Abstract

Decentralized detection in a network of wireless sensor nodes involves the fusion of information about a phenomenon of interest (PoI) from geographically dispersed nodes. In this paper, we investigate the problem of binary decentralized detection in a dense and randomly deployed wireless sensor network (WSN), whereby the communication channels between the nodes and the fusion center are bandwidth-constrained. We consider a scenario in which sensor observations, conditioned on the alternate hypothesis, are independent but not identically distributed across the sensor nodes.We compare two different fusion architectures, namely, the parallel fusion architecture (PFA) and the cooperative fusion architecture (CFA), for such bandwidthconstrained WSNs, where each sensor node is restricted to send a 1-bit information to the fusion center. For each architecture, we derive expression for the probability of decision error at the fusion center. We propose a consensus flooding protocol for CFA and analyze its average energy consumption. We analyze the effects of PoI intensity, realistic link models, consensus flooding protocol, and network connectivity on the system reliability and average energy consumption for both fusion architectures. We demonstrate that a trade-off exists among spatial diversity gain, average energy consumption, delivery ratio of the consensus flooding protocol, network connectivity, node density, and PoI intensity in CFA. We then provide insight into the design of cooperative WSNs.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11585/32569
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 64
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 46
social impact