Fourty percent of the EU land area is currently considered to be agriculturally managed, and there is growing attention to the environmental performance of farming practices. This involves the need for farm-scale monitoring programmes for sustainability, but their implementation is hampered by a number of difficulties such as the identification of indicators for different latitudes and environments and the evaluation of the effectiveness and costs of different monitoring approaches. In this paper, we focus on the costs of farm-scale biodiversity monitoring, presenting results from a Europe-wide cost data collection in the EU FP7 BioBio Project. Firstly, we propose an analytical assessment of resources consumed by the research units and a cost estimation for the measurement of six biodiversity-related parameters: habitat mapping, vegetation, wild bees and bumblebees, spiders, earthworms and a farm management questionnaire. Thereafter, we estimate a standardised cost for an ordinary measurement of the six parameters at farm-scale. In doing so, we highlight the cost differences between three strategies involving different potential actors (professional agencies, farmers, volunteers). This analysis shows that producing reliable data on monitoring costs requires a large sample pool of farms and farming systems as was the case in the BioBio project. The cost standardisation allows us to estimate the cost range between the different strategies ranging between €2700 and €8200 per farm

Estimating the cost of different strategies for measuring farmland biodiversity: evidence from a Europe-wide field evaluation / Stefano Targetti; felix Herzog ; Ilse Geijzendorffer ; Sebastian Wolfrum ; Michaela Arndorfer; Katalin Balàzs ; Jean Philippe Choisis ; Peter Dennis ; Sebastian Eiter ; Wendy Fjellstad ; Jurgen Friedel ; Philippe Jeanneret ; Rob Jongman ; Max Kainz ; Gisela Luescher ; Gerardo Moreno ; Tommaso Zanetti ; Jean Pierre Sarthou; Sitka Stoyanova ; Debra Bailey; Maurizio Paoletti ; Davide Viaggi. - In: ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS. - ISSN 1470-160X. - STAMPA. - 45:(2014), pp. 434-443. [10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.050]

Estimating the cost of different strategies for measuring farmland biodiversity: evidence from a Europe-wide field evaluation

Stefano Targetti;VIAGGI, DAVIDE
2014

Abstract

Fourty percent of the EU land area is currently considered to be agriculturally managed, and there is growing attention to the environmental performance of farming practices. This involves the need for farm-scale monitoring programmes for sustainability, but their implementation is hampered by a number of difficulties such as the identification of indicators for different latitudes and environments and the evaluation of the effectiveness and costs of different monitoring approaches. In this paper, we focus on the costs of farm-scale biodiversity monitoring, presenting results from a Europe-wide cost data collection in the EU FP7 BioBio Project. Firstly, we propose an analytical assessment of resources consumed by the research units and a cost estimation for the measurement of six biodiversity-related parameters: habitat mapping, vegetation, wild bees and bumblebees, spiders, earthworms and a farm management questionnaire. Thereafter, we estimate a standardised cost for an ordinary measurement of the six parameters at farm-scale. In doing so, we highlight the cost differences between three strategies involving different potential actors (professional agencies, farmers, volunteers). This analysis shows that producing reliable data on monitoring costs requires a large sample pool of farms and farming systems as was the case in the BioBio project. The cost standardisation allows us to estimate the cost range between the different strategies ranging between €2700 and €8200 per farm
2014
Estimating the cost of different strategies for measuring farmland biodiversity: evidence from a Europe-wide field evaluation / Stefano Targetti; felix Herzog ; Ilse Geijzendorffer ; Sebastian Wolfrum ; Michaela Arndorfer; Katalin Balàzs ; Jean Philippe Choisis ; Peter Dennis ; Sebastian Eiter ; Wendy Fjellstad ; Jurgen Friedel ; Philippe Jeanneret ; Rob Jongman ; Max Kainz ; Gisela Luescher ; Gerardo Moreno ; Tommaso Zanetti ; Jean Pierre Sarthou; Sitka Stoyanova ; Debra Bailey; Maurizio Paoletti ; Davide Viaggi. - In: ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS. - ISSN 1470-160X. - STAMPA. - 45:(2014), pp. 434-443. [10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.050]
Stefano Targetti; felix Herzog ; Ilse Geijzendorffer ; Sebastian Wolfrum ; Michaela Arndorfer; Katalin Balàzs ; Jean Philippe Choisis ; Peter Dennis ; Sebastian Eiter ; Wendy Fjellstad ; Jurgen Friedel ; Philippe Jeanneret ; Rob Jongman ; Max Kainz ; Gisela Luescher ; Gerardo Moreno ; Tommaso Zanetti ; Jean Pierre Sarthou; Sitka Stoyanova ; Debra Bailey; Maurizio Paoletti ; Davide Viaggi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/311722
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact