In this paper we study price competition, equilibrium market configurations and entry when firms compete in vertically-differentiated markets producing complementary goods. We consider two complements and start from a configuration where the market for one complement is a duopoly, whereas the other is a monopoly. In such framework, when products are highly differentiated, the low-quality duopolist is always pushed out. We then allow for competition between complements on both sides of the market: one of the duopolists starts to produce also the other complement and decides whether to offer its two products as a bundle or to allow consumers to combine them with complements from other producers. We prove that this strategy always allows the low-quality duopolist to stay in the market, no matter if the duopolist producing both complements is the high or the low-quality one. Moreover, this strategy always increases consumer surplus, even when the duopolist sells the two complements only as a bundle.

Matteo Alvisi, Emanuela Carbonara, Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci, Francesco Parisi (2009). Complementing Substitutes: Compatibility, Bundling and Entry. Amsterdam : Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics.

Complementing Substitutes: Compatibility, Bundling and Entry

Matteo Alvisi;Emanuela Carbonara;Francesco Parisi
2009

Abstract

In this paper we study price competition, equilibrium market configurations and entry when firms compete in vertically-differentiated markets producing complementary goods. We consider two complements and start from a configuration where the market for one complement is a duopoly, whereas the other is a monopoly. In such framework, when products are highly differentiated, the low-quality duopolist is always pushed out. We then allow for competition between complements on both sides of the market: one of the duopolists starts to produce also the other complement and decides whether to offer its two products as a bundle or to allow consumers to combine them with complements from other producers. We prove that this strategy always allows the low-quality duopolist to stay in the market, no matter if the duopolist producing both complements is the high or the low-quality one. Moreover, this strategy always increases consumer surplus, even when the duopolist sells the two complements only as a bundle.
2009
50
Matteo Alvisi, Emanuela Carbonara, Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci, Francesco Parisi (2009). Complementing Substitutes: Compatibility, Bundling and Entry. Amsterdam : Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics.
Matteo Alvisi; Emanuela Carbonara; Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci; Francesco Parisi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/266502
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact