OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of pancreatic resections in patients 80 years or older. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was carried out that compared perioperative outcomes after pancreatic resection in patients 80 years or older with patients younger than 80 years. The primary end points were postoperative mortality and morbidity. The secondary end points were incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, bile leak, pneumonia, postoperative infection, cardiologic complications, reoperation, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Nine studies were found to be suitable for the meta-analysis. The postoperative mortality and morbidity were significantly higher in the group 80 years or older (P < 0.00001 and P = 0.003, respectively) except for patients in whom there were no differences in preoperative comorbidities (P = 0.56 and P = 0.36, respectively). Postoperative cardiac complications were significantly more frequent in patients 80 years or older (P < 0.0001), and the length of hospital stay was significantly longer in octogenarian patients (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Patients 80 years or older have an increased incidence of postoperative mortality, morbidity, and cardiac complications and a longer length of hospital stay than do younger patients. Thus, pancreatic resection can be recommended only in a selected group of patients 80 years or older.

Casadei R, Ricci C, Lazzarini E, Taffurelli G, D'Ambra M, Mastroroberto M, et al. (2014). Pancreatic resection in patients 80 years of age and over: a meta-analysis and systematic review. PANCREAS, 43(8), 1208-1218 [10.1097/MPA.0000000000000182].

Pancreatic resection in patients 80 years of age and over: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

CASADEI, RICCARDO;RICCI, CLAUDIO;TAFFURELLI, GIOVANNI;D'AMBRA, MARIELDA;MASTROROBERTO, MARIANNA;MINNI, FRANCESCO
2014

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of pancreatic resections in patients 80 years or older. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was carried out that compared perioperative outcomes after pancreatic resection in patients 80 years or older with patients younger than 80 years. The primary end points were postoperative mortality and morbidity. The secondary end points were incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, bile leak, pneumonia, postoperative infection, cardiologic complications, reoperation, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Nine studies were found to be suitable for the meta-analysis. The postoperative mortality and morbidity were significantly higher in the group 80 years or older (P < 0.00001 and P = 0.003, respectively) except for patients in whom there were no differences in preoperative comorbidities (P = 0.56 and P = 0.36, respectively). Postoperative cardiac complications were significantly more frequent in patients 80 years or older (P < 0.0001), and the length of hospital stay was significantly longer in octogenarian patients (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Patients 80 years or older have an increased incidence of postoperative mortality, morbidity, and cardiac complications and a longer length of hospital stay than do younger patients. Thus, pancreatic resection can be recommended only in a selected group of patients 80 years or older.
2014
Casadei R, Ricci C, Lazzarini E, Taffurelli G, D'Ambra M, Mastroroberto M, et al. (2014). Pancreatic resection in patients 80 years of age and over: a meta-analysis and systematic review. PANCREAS, 43(8), 1208-1218 [10.1097/MPA.0000000000000182].
Casadei R; Ricci C; Lazzarini E; Taffurelli G; D'Ambra M; Mastroroberto M; Morselli-Labate AM; Minni F.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/263408
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 45
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 39
social impact