Objectives. This study examined the effect of chlorhexidine (CHX) content on degree of conversion (DC) and E-modulus of experimental adhesive blends. The hypothesis tested was that increasing concentrations of CHX result in decreased DC and E-modulus in relation to adhesive hydrophilicity. Methods. Experimental adhesive blends with increasing hydrophilicity R2 (70% bisGMA, 28.75% TEGDMA); R3 (70% BisGMA, 28.75% HEMA); R4 (40% BisGMA, 30% TCDM, 28.75% TEGDMA); R5 (40% BisGMA, 30% BisMP, 28.75% HEMA) and different CHX concentrations (I and 5%) were analyzed. 5% CHX could not be dissolved in R2. A differential scanning calorimeter was used to measure the DC of resin blends. Photopolymerized disks of the experimental comonomer mixtures (n = 10/gp) were used to measure the E-modulus of each specimen using a biaxial flexure test. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA (resin type and CHX concentration) and Tukey's post hoc test. Results. The addition of 1% CHX did not significantly alter the DC of R2 and R3. Significant decrease in R3 DC values was observed when 5% CHX was added. CHX significantly increased the DC of R4 and RS. 1% CHX reduced the E-modulus of all resins (p < 0.05) except for R2, in which the E-modulus was significantly increased (p < 0.05). 5% CHX significantly reduced the E-modulus of resins R3 to RS (p < 0.05). Significance. In conclusion, increasing concentrations of CHX dissolved in resin blends had little adverse effect on DC but decreased the E-modulus 27-48% compared to controls. Solvation of CHX in ethanol prior to incorporation of CHX into R2 may permit higher CHX concentrations without lower polymer stiffness. (C) 2009 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cadenaro M, Pashley DH, Marchesi G, Carrilho M, Antoniolli F, Mazzoni A, et al. (2009). Influence of chlorhexidine on the degree of conversion and E-modulus of experimental adhesive blends. DENTAL MATERIALS, 25(10), 1269-1274 [10.1016/j.dental.2009.05.008].

Influence of chlorhexidine on the degree of conversion and E-modulus of experimental adhesive blends

MAZZONI, ANNALISA;BRESCHI, LORENZO
2009

Abstract

Objectives. This study examined the effect of chlorhexidine (CHX) content on degree of conversion (DC) and E-modulus of experimental adhesive blends. The hypothesis tested was that increasing concentrations of CHX result in decreased DC and E-modulus in relation to adhesive hydrophilicity. Methods. Experimental adhesive blends with increasing hydrophilicity R2 (70% bisGMA, 28.75% TEGDMA); R3 (70% BisGMA, 28.75% HEMA); R4 (40% BisGMA, 30% TCDM, 28.75% TEGDMA); R5 (40% BisGMA, 30% BisMP, 28.75% HEMA) and different CHX concentrations (I and 5%) were analyzed. 5% CHX could not be dissolved in R2. A differential scanning calorimeter was used to measure the DC of resin blends. Photopolymerized disks of the experimental comonomer mixtures (n = 10/gp) were used to measure the E-modulus of each specimen using a biaxial flexure test. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA (resin type and CHX concentration) and Tukey's post hoc test. Results. The addition of 1% CHX did not significantly alter the DC of R2 and R3. Significant decrease in R3 DC values was observed when 5% CHX was added. CHX significantly increased the DC of R4 and RS. 1% CHX reduced the E-modulus of all resins (p < 0.05) except for R2, in which the E-modulus was significantly increased (p < 0.05). 5% CHX significantly reduced the E-modulus of resins R3 to RS (p < 0.05). Significance. In conclusion, increasing concentrations of CHX dissolved in resin blends had little adverse effect on DC but decreased the E-modulus 27-48% compared to controls. Solvation of CHX in ethanol prior to incorporation of CHX into R2 may permit higher CHX concentrations without lower polymer stiffness. (C) 2009 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2009
Cadenaro M, Pashley DH, Marchesi G, Carrilho M, Antoniolli F, Mazzoni A, et al. (2009). Influence of chlorhexidine on the degree of conversion and E-modulus of experimental adhesive blends. DENTAL MATERIALS, 25(10), 1269-1274 [10.1016/j.dental.2009.05.008].
Cadenaro M; Pashley DH; Marchesi G; Carrilho M; Antoniolli F; Mazzoni A; Tay FR; Di Lenarda R; Breschi L
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/262908
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 63
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 58
social impact