An accounting standard for goodwill, AASB 136 Impairment of Assets was implemented in Australia in 2005. However, several issues of compliance with the Standard were noted in the initial adoption periods. This study examines goodwill reporting practices in Australia over the five-year period from 2005 to 2010. It explores the extent to which Australian listed entities complied with mandatory requirements in relation to impairment testing. Using a sample of 287 Australian listed firms, we found that compliance with the Standard’s goodwill allocation requirements generally improved; however, there was still non-compliance for all reporting periods. Also, there was a tendency for firms to define the same or smaller numbers of cash-generating units (CGUs) than reporting segments. This suggests the existence of CGU aggregation, which may have the capacity to influence the incidence of goodwill impairment, and thereby the financial position of an entity. Coupled with non-compliance and a lack of audit attention, compliance issues surrounding goodwill impairment testing under AASB 136 still remain of concern to regulators. The findings are useful to academics, regulators and policymakers because they signal the (lack of) compliance with AASB 136.

Disclosure of Goodwill Impairment under AASB 136 from 2005–2010 / Guthrie J.; Pang T. T.. - In: AUSTRALIAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW. - ISSN 1035-6908. - STAMPA. - 23:3(2013), pp. 216-231. [10.1111/j.1835-2561.2013.00204.x]

Disclosure of Goodwill Impairment under AASB 136 from 2005–2010

GUTHRIE, JAMES;
2013

Abstract

An accounting standard for goodwill, AASB 136 Impairment of Assets was implemented in Australia in 2005. However, several issues of compliance with the Standard were noted in the initial adoption periods. This study examines goodwill reporting practices in Australia over the five-year period from 2005 to 2010. It explores the extent to which Australian listed entities complied with mandatory requirements in relation to impairment testing. Using a sample of 287 Australian listed firms, we found that compliance with the Standard’s goodwill allocation requirements generally improved; however, there was still non-compliance for all reporting periods. Also, there was a tendency for firms to define the same or smaller numbers of cash-generating units (CGUs) than reporting segments. This suggests the existence of CGU aggregation, which may have the capacity to influence the incidence of goodwill impairment, and thereby the financial position of an entity. Coupled with non-compliance and a lack of audit attention, compliance issues surrounding goodwill impairment testing under AASB 136 still remain of concern to regulators. The findings are useful to academics, regulators and policymakers because they signal the (lack of) compliance with AASB 136.
2013
Disclosure of Goodwill Impairment under AASB 136 from 2005–2010 / Guthrie J.; Pang T. T.. - In: AUSTRALIAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW. - ISSN 1035-6908. - STAMPA. - 23:3(2013), pp. 216-231. [10.1111/j.1835-2561.2013.00204.x]
Guthrie J.; Pang T. T.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/258326
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact