This paper analyzes the question of lying from a philosophical point of view. It focuses on the famous controversy between Kant and Constant trying to enucleate the complex typology of arguments that the two philosophers elaborate to condemn (Kant) or defend (Constant) lying. On the ground of this comparison the author recognizes a common element: the moral and political refusal of arbitrariness.

Riflessioni sul mentire. A partire da una rilettura della vecchia polemica tra Kant e Constant

LALATTA COSTERBOSA, MARINA
2014

Abstract

This paper analyzes the question of lying from a philosophical point of view. It focuses on the famous controversy between Kant and Constant trying to enucleate the complex typology of arguments that the two philosophers elaborate to condemn (Kant) or defend (Constant) lying. On the ground of this comparison the author recognizes a common element: the moral and political refusal of arbitrariness.
2014
M. Lalatta Costerbosa
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/252752
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact