CRIS Current Research Information System
IRIS è la soluzione IT che facilita la raccolta e la gestione dei dati relativi alle attività e ai prodotti della ricerca. Fornisce a ricercatori, amministratori e valutatori gli strumenti per monitorare i risultati della ricerca, aumentarne la visibilità e allocare in modo efficace le risorse disponibili.
EnglishIn this study the raising and development of the immune response to Borrelia burgdorferi infection in 45 Italian patients suffering from culture-confirmed Lyme Borreliosis erythema migrans (EM) was investigated. A total of 95 serially collected serum samples were tested by using three different commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs): recomWell Borrelia, Mikrogen, Enzygnost Borreliosis, DADE Behring, and Quick ELISA C6, Immunetics. The sensitivity of Enzygnost Borreliosis IgM (70.5%) was higher than that of recomWell Borrelia IgM (55.7%), whereas recomWell Borrelia IgG was far more sensitive (57.9%) than Enzygnost Borreliosis IgG (36.8%). Quick ELISA C6 Borrelia was 62.1% sensitive. In order to compare specificity values of the three ELISAs, we tested a panel of sera obtained from blood donors (210 samples coming from a non endemic area and 24 samples from an endemic area) and from patients suffering from some of the most common biological conditions possibly resulting in false-positive reactivity in Lyme disease serology (n=40). recomWell Borrelia IgG and recomWell Borrelia IgM were the most specific (97.1% and 98.9%, respectively), followed by Quick ELISA C6 Borrelia (96.7%). Finally, Enzygnost Borreliosis IgG and IgM achieved 90.1% and 92.3% specificity, respectively. Sera that gave discrepant results when tested by the three ELISAs were further analysed by WB.
| Titolo: | COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THREE DIFFERENT ELISA METHODS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF EARLY CULTURE-CONFIRMED LYME DISEASE IN ITALY | |
| Autore/i: | MARANGONI, ANTONELLA; SPARACINO M.; CAVRINI, FRANCESCA; STORNI, ELISA; MONDARDINI V.; SAMBRI, VITTORIO; CEVENINI, ROBERTO | |
| Autore/i Unibo: | ||
| Anno: | 2005 | |
| Rivista: | ||
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.45853-0 | |
| Abstract: | In this study the raising and development of the immune response to Borrelia burgdorferi infection in 45 Italian patients suffering from culture-confirmed Lyme Borreliosis erythema migrans (EM) was investigated. A total of 95 serially collected serum samples were tested by using three different commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs): recomWell Borrelia, Mikrogen, Enzygnost Borreliosis, DADE Behring, and Quick ELISA C6, Immunetics. The sensitivity of Enzygnost Borreliosis IgM (70.5%) was higher than that of recomWell Borrelia IgM (55.7%), whereas recomWell Borrelia IgG was far more sensitive (57.9%) than Enzygnost Borreliosis IgG (36.8%). Quick ELISA C6 Borrelia was 62.1% sensitive. In order to compare specificity values of the three ELISAs, we tested a panel of sera obtained from blood donors (210 samples coming from a non endemic area and 24 samples from an endemic area) and from patients suffering from some of the most common biological conditions possibly resulting in false-positive reactivity in Lyme disease serology (n=40). recomWell Borrelia IgG and recomWell Borrelia IgM were the most specific (97.1% and 98.9%, respectively), followed by Quick ELISA C6 Borrelia (96.7%). Finally, Enzygnost Borreliosis IgG and IgM achieved 90.1% and 92.3% specificity, respectively. Sera that gave discrepant results when tested by the three ELISAs were further analysed by WB. | |
| Data prodotto definitivo in UGOV: | 2005-10-03 15:35:03 | |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.01 Articolo in rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
http://hdl.handle.net/11585/2514
Copyright © 2021