Scientific interest in ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in women has grown considerably over the past 2 decades. A substantial amount of the literature on this subject is centred on sex differences in clinical aspects of IHD. Many reports have documented sex-related differences in presentation, risk profiles, and outcomes among patients with IHD, particularly acute myocardial infarction. Such differences have often been attributed to inequalities between men and women in the referral and treatment of IHD, but data are insufficient to support this assessment. The determinants of sex differences in presentation are unclear, and few clues are available as to why young, premenopausal women paradoxically have a greater incidence of adverse outcomes after acute myocardial infarction than men, despite having less-severe coronary artery disease. Although differential treatment on the basis of patient sex continues to be described, the extent to which such inequalities persist and whether they reflect true disparity is unclear. Additionally, much uncertainty surrounds possible sex-related differences in response to cardiovascular therapies, partly because of a persistent lack of female-specific data from cardiovascular clinical trials. In this Review, we assess the evidence for sex-related differences in the clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome of IHD, and identify gaps in the literature that need to be addressed in future research efforts.

Presentation, management, and outcomes of ischaemic heart disease in women / Vaccarino V; Badimon L; Corti R; de Wit C ;Dorobantu M; Manfrini O; Koller A; Pries A; Cenko E; Bugiardini R. - In: NATURE REVIEWS. CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 1759-5002. - STAMPA. - 10:9(2013), pp. 508-518. [10.1038/nrcardio.2013.93]

Presentation, management, and outcomes of ischaemic heart disease in women.

MANFRINI, OLIVIA;CENKO, EDINA;BUGIARDINI, RAFFAELE
2013

Abstract

Scientific interest in ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in women has grown considerably over the past 2 decades. A substantial amount of the literature on this subject is centred on sex differences in clinical aspects of IHD. Many reports have documented sex-related differences in presentation, risk profiles, and outcomes among patients with IHD, particularly acute myocardial infarction. Such differences have often been attributed to inequalities between men and women in the referral and treatment of IHD, but data are insufficient to support this assessment. The determinants of sex differences in presentation are unclear, and few clues are available as to why young, premenopausal women paradoxically have a greater incidence of adverse outcomes after acute myocardial infarction than men, despite having less-severe coronary artery disease. Although differential treatment on the basis of patient sex continues to be described, the extent to which such inequalities persist and whether they reflect true disparity is unclear. Additionally, much uncertainty surrounds possible sex-related differences in response to cardiovascular therapies, partly because of a persistent lack of female-specific data from cardiovascular clinical trials. In this Review, we assess the evidence for sex-related differences in the clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome of IHD, and identify gaps in the literature that need to be addressed in future research efforts.
2013
Presentation, management, and outcomes of ischaemic heart disease in women / Vaccarino V; Badimon L; Corti R; de Wit C ;Dorobantu M; Manfrini O; Koller A; Pries A; Cenko E; Bugiardini R. - In: NATURE REVIEWS. CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 1759-5002. - STAMPA. - 10:9(2013), pp. 508-518. [10.1038/nrcardio.2013.93]
Vaccarino V; Badimon L; Corti R; de Wit C ;Dorobantu M; Manfrini O; Koller A; Pries A; Cenko E; Bugiardini R
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/186115
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 28
  • Scopus 99
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 88
social impact