Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy is the technique of delivering radiation to cancer patients by using non-uniform radiation fields from selected angles, with the aim of reducing the intensity of the beams that go through critical structures while reaching the dose prescription in the target volume. Two decisions are of fundamental importance: to select the beam angles and to compute the intensity of the beams used to deliver the radiation to the patient. Often, these two decisions are made separately: first, the treatment planners, on the basis of experience and intuition, decide the orientation of the beams and then the intensities of the beams are optimized by using an automated software tool. Automatic beam angle selection (also known as Beam Angle Optimization) is an important problem and is today often based on human experience. In this context, we face the problem of optimizing both the decisions, developing an algorithm which automatically selects the beam angles and computes the beam intensities. We propose a hybrid heuristic method, which combines a simulated annealing procedure with the knowledge of the gradient. Gradient information is used to quickly find a local minimum, while simulated annealing allows to search for global minima. As an integral part of this procedure, the beam intensities are optimized by solving a Linear Programming model. The proposed method presents a main difference from previous works: it does not require to have on input a set of candidate beam angles. Indeed, it dynamically explores angles and the only discretization that is necessary is due to the maximum accuracy that can be achieved by the linear accelerator machine. Experimental results are performed on phantom and real-life case studies, showing the advantages that come from our approach.

A hybrid approach to beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy

CACCHIANI, VALENTINA;
2013

Abstract

Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy is the technique of delivering radiation to cancer patients by using non-uniform radiation fields from selected angles, with the aim of reducing the intensity of the beams that go through critical structures while reaching the dose prescription in the target volume. Two decisions are of fundamental importance: to select the beam angles and to compute the intensity of the beams used to deliver the radiation to the patient. Often, these two decisions are made separately: first, the treatment planners, on the basis of experience and intuition, decide the orientation of the beams and then the intensities of the beams are optimized by using an automated software tool. Automatic beam angle selection (also known as Beam Angle Optimization) is an important problem and is today often based on human experience. In this context, we face the problem of optimizing both the decisions, developing an algorithm which automatically selects the beam angles and computes the beam intensities. We propose a hybrid heuristic method, which combines a simulated annealing procedure with the knowledge of the gradient. Gradient information is used to quickly find a local minimum, while simulated annealing allows to search for global minima. As an integral part of this procedure, the beam intensities are optimized by solving a Linear Programming model. The proposed method presents a main difference from previous works: it does not require to have on input a set of candidate beam angles. Indeed, it dynamically explores angles and the only discretization that is necessary is due to the maximum accuracy that can be achieved by the linear accelerator machine. Experimental results are performed on phantom and real-life case studies, showing the advantages that come from our approach.
D. Bertsimas; V. Cacchiani; D. Craft; O. Nohadani
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/185110
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 43
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 39
social impact