The aim of the article is not to reopen the dossier of the self-quotations in order to reexamine their exploitation for a chronology of Origen’s works, as established by Nautin and others, although it is not possible to ignore this problem altogether. I am indeed interested in exploring self-quotations as useful clues for a better understanding of what we may call Origen’s ‘literary pragmatics’ as far as the author himself is concerned.
L. Perrone (2011). Origenes pro domo sua: Self-Quotations and the (Re-) Construction of a literary œuvre. Leuven : PEETERS.
Origenes pro domo sua: Self-Quotations and the (Re-) Construction of a literary œuvre
PERRONE, LORENZO
2011
Abstract
The aim of the article is not to reopen the dossier of the self-quotations in order to reexamine their exploitation for a chronology of Origen’s works, as established by Nautin and others, although it is not possible to ignore this problem altogether. I am indeed interested in exploring self-quotations as useful clues for a better understanding of what we may call Origen’s ‘literary pragmatics’ as far as the author himself is concerned.File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.