The public debate on agrobiotechnology is, at present, intense and, occasionally, ideologically polarized. A causal model explaining acceptance of gene technology developed by Siegrist (1999, 2000) was tested in an Italian sample. According to this model acceptance of biotechnology depends on three variables: perceived risks, perceived benefits and trust. Along with this model, we also tested the role of pro-environmental orientation as measured by the revised Dunlap and Van Liere's (2000) New Environmental Paradigm (nep) Scale. It was hypothesized that intention to consume genetically modified food is function of trust, perception of benefit, and negatively of perception of risk, and pro-environmental orientation. A sample of 1,009 Italians of at least eighteen years of age took part in a telephone survey. Results demonstrated that trust, perception of risk and benefit and pro-environmental orientation influence intention to consume genetically modified food. More specifically, the most important predictor was perceived benefits, whereas the measure of trust was not particular determinant with the exception of trust in political institutions, mass media, and multinationals. A pro-environmental orientation did explain a significant amount of variance; however its influence was not always in the expected direction.

Percezione di rischi e benefici, fiducia e atteggiamento pro-ambientale come predittori dell'intenzione di consumare cibi OGM / Perceived Benefits and Risks, Social Trust, and Proenvironmental Orientation as Predictors of Intention to Comsume Genetically Modified Food / G. Prati;L. Pietrantoni;B. Zani. - In: RASSEGNA DI PSICOLOGIA. - ISSN 1125-5196. - STAMPA. - 3:(2012), pp. 9-26. [10.7379/72659]

Percezione di rischi e benefici, fiducia e atteggiamento pro-ambientale come predittori dell'intenzione di consumare cibi OGM / Perceived Benefits and Risks, Social Trust, and Proenvironmental Orientation as Predictors of Intention to Comsume Genetically Modified Food

PRATI, GABRIELE;PIETRANTONI, LUCA;ZANI, BRUNA
2012

Abstract

The public debate on agrobiotechnology is, at present, intense and, occasionally, ideologically polarized. A causal model explaining acceptance of gene technology developed by Siegrist (1999, 2000) was tested in an Italian sample. According to this model acceptance of biotechnology depends on three variables: perceived risks, perceived benefits and trust. Along with this model, we also tested the role of pro-environmental orientation as measured by the revised Dunlap and Van Liere's (2000) New Environmental Paradigm (nep) Scale. It was hypothesized that intention to consume genetically modified food is function of trust, perception of benefit, and negatively of perception of risk, and pro-environmental orientation. A sample of 1,009 Italians of at least eighteen years of age took part in a telephone survey. Results demonstrated that trust, perception of risk and benefit and pro-environmental orientation influence intention to consume genetically modified food. More specifically, the most important predictor was perceived benefits, whereas the measure of trust was not particular determinant with the exception of trust in political institutions, mass media, and multinationals. A pro-environmental orientation did explain a significant amount of variance; however its influence was not always in the expected direction.
2012
Percezione di rischi e benefici, fiducia e atteggiamento pro-ambientale come predittori dell'intenzione di consumare cibi OGM / Perceived Benefits and Risks, Social Trust, and Proenvironmental Orientation as Predictors of Intention to Comsume Genetically Modified Food / G. Prati;L. Pietrantoni;B. Zani. - In: RASSEGNA DI PSICOLOGIA. - ISSN 1125-5196. - STAMPA. - 3:(2012), pp. 9-26. [10.7379/72659]
G. Prati;L. Pietrantoni;B. Zani
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/146300
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact