As universities are increasingly called by their national governments for a more entrepreneurial management of public research results, they started to develop internal structures and policies to take a proactive role in the commercialisation of university research. For the first time, this paper presents a detailed chronicle of how countrylevel reforms on Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) were translated into organisationlevel mechanisms to regulate university-patenting activity. The analysis is based on the complete list of patent policies issued between 1993 and 2009 by the population of Italian universities. Our evidence suggests that universities first dealt with legislative changes on IPRs by enacting isomorphic behaviours, then by creating a community of practices, and finally by leveraging on such community to influence government reforms on IP-related matters. We discuss our results in the light of institutional theory and public policy.
Nicola, B., Riccardo, F., Rosa, G., Maurizio, S. (2014). Organisational change and the institutionalisation of university patenting activity in Italy. MINERVA, 52(1), 27-53 [10.1007/s11024-013-9243-9].
Organisational change and the institutionalisation of university patenting activity in Italy
Riccardo Fini;Rosa Grimaldi;Maurizio Sobrero
2014
Abstract
As universities are increasingly called by their national governments for a more entrepreneurial management of public research results, they started to develop internal structures and policies to take a proactive role in the commercialisation of university research. For the first time, this paper presents a detailed chronicle of how countrylevel reforms on Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) were translated into organisationlevel mechanisms to regulate university-patenting activity. The analysis is based on the complete list of patent policies issued between 1993 and 2009 by the population of Italian universities. Our evidence suggests that universities first dealt with legislative changes on IPRs by enacting isomorphic behaviours, then by creating a community of practices, and finally by leveraging on such community to influence government reforms on IP-related matters. We discuss our results in the light of institutional theory and public policy.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.