Moving from Michel Foucault’s criticism, in the mid1970s, of a “theory of the State”, this paper is addressing the relevance – for the current process of making the “Constitution” of a European Union – of the obsolescence of the State concept and the emergence instead, in the course of the twentieth-century, of an idea of “social control” as a way to represent conditions for social order within the new mass democratic society. Such conditions, and the theory thereof, first developed in North America and then increasingly in Europe after WW2 and especially since the 1970s. From such comparative-historical perspective, the paper then tries to shed light on the debate that was ignited by Dieter Grimm on the very possibility of a “democratic constitutionalization” of Europe. The connections among language, social control, and a (democratic) European Constitution are then discussed, and specific attention is given to the nexus that has been constructed in today’s Europe between migration, criminalization and security, as a sort of test bench of those connections.
D. Melossi (2005). Security, Social Control, Democracy and Migration within the ‘Constitution’ of the EU. EUROPEAN LAW JOURNAL, 11, 5-21.
Security, Social Control, Democracy and Migration within the ‘Constitution’ of the EU
MELOSSI, DARIO
2005
Abstract
Moving from Michel Foucault’s criticism, in the mid1970s, of a “theory of the State”, this paper is addressing the relevance – for the current process of making the “Constitution” of a European Union – of the obsolescence of the State concept and the emergence instead, in the course of the twentieth-century, of an idea of “social control” as a way to represent conditions for social order within the new mass democratic society. Such conditions, and the theory thereof, first developed in North America and then increasingly in Europe after WW2 and especially since the 1970s. From such comparative-historical perspective, the paper then tries to shed light on the debate that was ignited by Dieter Grimm on the very possibility of a “democratic constitutionalization” of Europe. The connections among language, social control, and a (democratic) European Constitution are then discussed, and specific attention is given to the nexus that has been constructed in today’s Europe between migration, criminalization and security, as a sort of test bench of those connections.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.