In order to investigate the quality of life on home parenteral nutrition and after intestinal transplantation using comparable questionnaires, the treatmentspecific quality of life questionnaire for adult patients on home parenteral nutrition was adapted for intestinal transplant recipients. Both instruments were composed of 8 functional scales, 9 symptom scales, 3 global health status/quality of life scales and 2 single items. A preliminary cross-sectional study enrolling all the patients currently cared at the same hospital was carried out. Exclusion criteria were age ≥ 60 years and hospitalization at time of assessment. Thirty-three home parenteral nutrition patients (100% answered) and 22 intestinal transplant recipients (82% answered) were enrolled. Intestinal transplant recipients showed a better score in following scales: ability to holiday/travel (p < 0.001), fatigue (p = 0.022), gastrointestinal symptoms (p < 0.001), stoma management/bowel movements (p = 0.001) and global health status/quality of life (p = 0.012). A better score for ability to eat/drink (p = 0.070) and a worse score for sleep pattern (p = 0.100) after intestinal transplantation were also observed. The results of this preliminary study with specific instruments were consistent with the main expected improvement of the quality of life related to intestinal transplantation. Further studies in larger patient cohorts are required to confirm these data.

Assessment of quality of life on home parenteral nutrition and after intestinal transplantation using treatment-specific questionnaires / Pironi L; Baxter JP; Lauro A; Guidetti M; Agostini F; Zanfi C; Pinna AD.. - In: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION. - ISSN 1600-6135. - STAMPA. - 12 Suppl 4:(2012), pp. S60-S66. [10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04244.x]

Assessment of quality of life on home parenteral nutrition and after intestinal transplantation using treatment-specific questionnaires

PIRONI, LORIS;PINNA, ANTONIO DANIELE
2012

Abstract

In order to investigate the quality of life on home parenteral nutrition and after intestinal transplantation using comparable questionnaires, the treatmentspecific quality of life questionnaire for adult patients on home parenteral nutrition was adapted for intestinal transplant recipients. Both instruments were composed of 8 functional scales, 9 symptom scales, 3 global health status/quality of life scales and 2 single items. A preliminary cross-sectional study enrolling all the patients currently cared at the same hospital was carried out. Exclusion criteria were age ≥ 60 years and hospitalization at time of assessment. Thirty-three home parenteral nutrition patients (100% answered) and 22 intestinal transplant recipients (82% answered) were enrolled. Intestinal transplant recipients showed a better score in following scales: ability to holiday/travel (p < 0.001), fatigue (p = 0.022), gastrointestinal symptoms (p < 0.001), stoma management/bowel movements (p = 0.001) and global health status/quality of life (p = 0.012). A better score for ability to eat/drink (p = 0.070) and a worse score for sleep pattern (p = 0.100) after intestinal transplantation were also observed. The results of this preliminary study with specific instruments were consistent with the main expected improvement of the quality of life related to intestinal transplantation. Further studies in larger patient cohorts are required to confirm these data.
2012
Assessment of quality of life on home parenteral nutrition and after intestinal transplantation using treatment-specific questionnaires / Pironi L; Baxter JP; Lauro A; Guidetti M; Agostini F; Zanfi C; Pinna AD.. - In: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION. - ISSN 1600-6135. - STAMPA. - 12 Suppl 4:(2012), pp. S60-S66. [10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04244.x]
Pironi L; Baxter JP; Lauro A; Guidetti M; Agostini F; Zanfi C; Pinna AD.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/132997
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 52
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 48
social impact