People’s reactions to crimes sometimes change depending on whether the culprits are the members of the ingroup or an outgroup. This issue raises questions on the study of moral reasoning. That is, is the individual’s level of moral reasoning unambiguous or does the group membership of the person to be judged exert an influence? In this research we analysed the combined effects of the protagonist’s nationality of a moral dilemma and social dominance orientation (SDO) attitudes on the level of moral reasoning. Two-hundred and thirty Italian participants responded to two moral dilemmas taken from the Defining Issues Test modified so that one was about an Italian and the other was about a Romanian. The results showed a significant interaction between the dilemma and the protagonist’s nationality and SDO: low SDO participants did not have a different level on the P-score (post-conventional reasoning) judging the two nationalities, while high SDO participants tended to have a higher P-score in judging Italians as opposed to Romanians.

Passini S., Villano P. (2013). Judging Moral Issues in a Multicultural Society: Moral Reasoning and Social Dominance Orientation. SWISS JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 72(4), 235-239 [10.1024/1421-0185/a000116].

Judging Moral Issues in a Multicultural Society: Moral Reasoning and Social Dominance Orientation

PASSINI, STEFANO;VILLANO, PAOLA
2013

Abstract

People’s reactions to crimes sometimes change depending on whether the culprits are the members of the ingroup or an outgroup. This issue raises questions on the study of moral reasoning. That is, is the individual’s level of moral reasoning unambiguous or does the group membership of the person to be judged exert an influence? In this research we analysed the combined effects of the protagonist’s nationality of a moral dilemma and social dominance orientation (SDO) attitudes on the level of moral reasoning. Two-hundred and thirty Italian participants responded to two moral dilemmas taken from the Defining Issues Test modified so that one was about an Italian and the other was about a Romanian. The results showed a significant interaction between the dilemma and the protagonist’s nationality and SDO: low SDO participants did not have a different level on the P-score (post-conventional reasoning) judging the two nationalities, while high SDO participants tended to have a higher P-score in judging Italians as opposed to Romanians.
2013
Passini S., Villano P. (2013). Judging Moral Issues in a Multicultural Society: Moral Reasoning and Social Dominance Orientation. SWISS JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 72(4), 235-239 [10.1024/1421-0185/a000116].
Passini S.; Villano P.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/132318
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact