This paper deals with the question of how constitutive rules in Searle’s sense can be subject to definite constraints, or boundaries. Three kinds of boundaries to institutional constitution are here identified: ontological, structural, and pragmatic. All these kinds of boundaries to some extent depend on the context of the broader social practice for which rule-constituted institutions are created. Further, the paper introduces a fourth kind of boundaries, called “mimetic”, which limit the process of institutional constitution according to a pre-existing social or natural reality that the institution is meant to imitate.
Roversi C. (2012). Mimetic Constitutive Rules. PHENOMENOLOGY AND MIND, 2, 144-151 [10.13128/Phe_Mi-19634].
Mimetic Constitutive Rules
ROVERSI, CORRADO
2012
Abstract
This paper deals with the question of how constitutive rules in Searle’s sense can be subject to definite constraints, or boundaries. Three kinds of boundaries to institutional constitution are here identified: ontological, structural, and pragmatic. All these kinds of boundaries to some extent depend on the context of the broader social practice for which rule-constituted institutions are created. Further, the paper introduces a fourth kind of boundaries, called “mimetic”, which limit the process of institutional constitution according to a pre-existing social or natural reality that the institution is meant to imitate.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
CORRADO ROVERSI 7081-Article Text-7006-1-1-20191023.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
155.42 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
155.42 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.