To separate the atrial (AA) from the ventricular (VA) electrical activity in surface ECG recordings of atrial fibrillation (AF), various methods have been proposed, such as QRS-T cancellation by beat-averaged template subtraction, and blind source separation (BSS). Although QRS-T cancellation is computationally more efficient than BSS, and allows the preservation of spatial information, it is sensitive to morphology changes, which produce large residuals in AA, biasing the frequency analysis. Aim of this study was: (i) to propose an improved approach to VA cancellation based on k-means morphology clustering (MC); (ii) to validate its ability to estimate AF dominant frequency (DF) on a standard database with intra-cardiac and surface ECG recordings (IAFDB, Physionet.org); (iii) to compare the temporal evolution of the spectral content of MC-estimated AA (MC-AA) with the one obtained from a reference BSS method based on Independent component analysis (ICA) and second-order blind identification (SOBI), in 14 body surface potential map (BSPM) recordings. QRS-T amplitude in MC-AA was significantly lower (p<0.001) than in ECG (in closest BSPM channel to V1). The validation on IAFDB showed no significant difference in DF estimation (p=0.546) in 17 recordings. Also no significant difference in DF estimation (p=0.208) with respect to the reference BSS method was observed. The proposed QRS-T cancellation method effectively suppresses VA and accurately estimates DF compared to an established BSS method.

L.Y. Di Marco, S. King, J. Bourke, L. Chiari, A. Murray, P. Langley (2011). Time-frequency Analysis of Atrial Fibrillation Comparing Morphology-clustering Based QRS-T Cancellation with Blind Source Separation in Multi-lead Surface ECG Recordings.

Time-frequency Analysis of Atrial Fibrillation Comparing Morphology-clustering Based QRS-T Cancellation with Blind Source Separation in Multi-lead Surface ECG Recordings

DI MARCO, LUIGI YURI;CHIARI, LORENZO;
2011

Abstract

To separate the atrial (AA) from the ventricular (VA) electrical activity in surface ECG recordings of atrial fibrillation (AF), various methods have been proposed, such as QRS-T cancellation by beat-averaged template subtraction, and blind source separation (BSS). Although QRS-T cancellation is computationally more efficient than BSS, and allows the preservation of spatial information, it is sensitive to morphology changes, which produce large residuals in AA, biasing the frequency analysis. Aim of this study was: (i) to propose an improved approach to VA cancellation based on k-means morphology clustering (MC); (ii) to validate its ability to estimate AF dominant frequency (DF) on a standard database with intra-cardiac and surface ECG recordings (IAFDB, Physionet.org); (iii) to compare the temporal evolution of the spectral content of MC-estimated AA (MC-AA) with the one obtained from a reference BSS method based on Independent component analysis (ICA) and second-order blind identification (SOBI), in 14 body surface potential map (BSPM) recordings. QRS-T amplitude in MC-AA was significantly lower (p<0.001) than in ECG (in closest BSPM channel to V1). The validation on IAFDB showed no significant difference in DF estimation (p=0.546) in 17 recordings. Also no significant difference in DF estimation (p=0.208) with respect to the reference BSS method was observed. The proposed QRS-T cancellation method effectively suppresses VA and accurately estimates DF compared to an established BSS method.
2011
Computing in Cardiology
269
272
L.Y. Di Marco, S. King, J. Bourke, L. Chiari, A. Murray, P. Langley (2011). Time-frequency Analysis of Atrial Fibrillation Comparing Morphology-clustering Based QRS-T Cancellation with Blind Source Separation in Multi-lead Surface ECG Recordings.
L.Y. Di Marco; S. King; J. Bourke; L. Chiari; A. Murray; P. Langley
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/125146
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact